0 HEAD
1 SOUR RootsMagic
2 NAME RootsMagic
2 VERS 2.02
2 CORP RootsMagic, Inc.
3 ADDR PO Box 495
4 CONT Springville, UT 84663
4 CONT USA
3 PHON 1-877-ROOTSMAGIC
3 WWW WWW.ROOTSMAGIC.COM
1 DEST RootsMagic
1 DATE 30 OCT 2004
1 FILE index.ged
1 GEDC
2 VERS 5.5
2 FORM LINEAGE-LINKED
1 CHAR ANSI
0 @I68@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 88F74DFCA350CD4E94A035E1F430BF000350
1 CHAN
2 DATE 23 Oct 2004
1 NOTE
2 CONT Through DNA analysis, it has been shown that Thomas is related to curre
2 CONC nt residences of Harpole, Northampton, England.   Harpole is a small vi
2 CONC llage that has had a long list of  Cory families.  In the records of th
2 CONC e Harpole Parish, Northampton, we find a Thomas Cory that may well be t
2 CONC his person.  The birth date of circa 1622 is taken from the Christening r
2 CONC ecords of the parish and he as been attached to that family.  This fact h
2 CONC as not been proven and so should be view as only a tentative connection t
2 CONC o the Harpole Corys.
2 CONT
2 CONT He was in Charleston, Suffolk Co, MA as early as 1658.   How or when he c
2 CONC ame to America is not known.  He is first heard of at Chelmsford, Middl
2 CONC esex Co, MA where his name appears on Chelmsford's oldest tax list in 1
2 CONC 671, for the payment of 12 shillings for the Townes engagment to the mi
2 CONC nister.  He was a solder in the King Phillips War, 1675-1676. He worked a
2 CONC s a blacksmith in Chelmsford.
2 CONT
2 CONT Other information says that he and his brother John, set sail form Devo
2 CONC nshire, England in 1657/58?   They landed a Charleston, MA.  In 1662 th
2 CONC ey were granted land by the Crown in Chelmsford, MA.  John Cory moved t
2 CONC o RI or CT and started his family.
2 CONT
2 CONT There are some records that have him near Boston as early as 1644. This i
2 CONC s most likely the adopted son of Giles Cory, Thomas Rich, the son of Ma
2 CONC rtha Penyor and her first husband Henry Rich, his third wife. He was a m
2 CONC ulatto and worked to clear his mother's name after the Salem Witch tria
2 CONC ls.
2 CONT
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1622
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE 2 MAY 1706
2 PLAC Watertown, Middlesex Co, MA
1 CHR
2 DATE 16 NOV 1622
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMC @F2960@
0 @I70@ INDI
1 NAME Giles /Cory/
2 GIVN Giles
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 99CB6667D208CD43A3634E12AD73E749D1F0
1 CHAN
2 DATE 24 Jun 2004
1 NOTE This examination was most unfortunate, as it immediately gave the matte
2 CONC r importance throughout the colony, whereas it had been a local affair u
2 CONC p to that time.
2 CONT
2 CONT As if there was not excitement enough, the Reverend Deodate Lawson was i
2 CONC nvited back to preach a powerful lecture-day sermon on the text, "And t
2 CONC he Lord said unto Satan, the Lord rebuke thee, O Satan! even the Lord t
2 CONC hat has chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee; is not this a brand plucked out o
2 CONC f the fire?"  As may be supposed, he handled the Devil in a way to let n
2 CONC o one doubt his reality, or the utter damnation that would follow any a
2 CONC ssociation with him.  This did not tend to allay the excitement.
2 CONT
2 CONT The accusers were not satiated yet.  Warrants and commitments now follo
2 CONC wed in rapid secession.  The next victim was Giles Cory, eighty years o
2 CONC f age (Really 71 years old.).  He was infatuated by the storm of witchc
2 CONC raft, and attended the hearings.  At last the girls did not think that h
2 CONC e was as strong as he ought to be in some of his evidence in a case, an
2 CONC d cried out upon him, declaring that he afflicted them with fits and pi
2 CONC nches.
2 CONT
2 CONT On April 18th, Giles Cory and Mary Warren of the Village, Abigail Hobbs o
2 CONC f Topsfield, and Bridget Bishop of Salem were arrested.  On April 19th, t
2 CONC hey were examined.  Only Abigail Hobbs confessed.
2 CONT
2 CONT The court ordered Cory's hands to be tied, and they asked him if it wer
2 CONC e not enough to "act witchcraft at other times, but must you do it now i
2 CONC n face of authority?"  He replied, "I am a poor creature and cannot hel
2 CONC p it."  Again, a magistrate exclaimed, "Why do you tell such wicked lie
2 CONC s against witnesses?"  One of his hands was loosed and the girls were a
2 CONC fflicted.  He held his head on on side, and the heads of the afflicted w
2 CONC ere held on one side.  He drew in his cheeks, and the cheeks of the aff
2 CONC licted were sucked in.
2 CONT
2 CONT This was a preliminary examination.  He was never formally tried, as he w
2 CONC ould not plead.  He was committed to jail.
2 CONT
2 CONT Two days later, April 22th, nine  more,  Nehemiah Abbott, William and D
2 CONC eliverence Hobbs, Edward and Sarah Bishop, Mary Easty, Mary Black, Sara
2 CONC h Wildes, and Mary English were examined before Hathorne and Corwin. On
2 CONC ly Nehemiah was cleared of charges.
2 CONT
2 CONT May 2, Sarah Morey, Lydia Dustin, Susannah Martin, and Dorcas Hoar were e
2 CONC xamined by Hathorne and Corwin.
2 CONT
2 CONT Several other arrests followed.
2 CONT
2 CONT Reverend George Burroughs had earlier been pastor of the Salem Village c
2 CONC hurch but had left for a parish in Wells, Maine after arguments with An
2 CONC n Putnam, the mother of the 12-year-old of the same name. In 1692, daug
2 CONC hter Ann Putnam testified that Rev. Burroughs had appeared before her i
2 CONC n an apparition one night asking her to sign the Devil's books. Two wom
2 CONC en also appeared in this apparition, Ann Putnam reported that they were t
2 CONC he Rev. Burroughs' first and second wives. These wives "told" Ann Putna
2 CONC m that Rev. Burroughs had murdered both of them. Based upon this appari
2 CONC tion, on May 4, Rev. George Burroughs was arrested in Wells, Maine and b
2 CONC rought back to Salem. Burroughs was examined by Hathorne, Corwin, Sewal
2 CONC l, and William Stoughton on May 9. One of the afflicted girls, Sarah Ch
2 CONC urchill, was also exammined.
2 CONT
2 CONT May 10th, Geoge Jacobs, Sr. and his granddaughter Margaret were examine
2 CONC d before
2 CONT Hathorne and Corwin.  Margaret confessed and testified tha her grandfat
2 CONC her and
2 CONT George Burroughs were both witches.
2 CONT
2 CONT On May 14th, several more warrents, including one for Elizabeth Cory of C
2 CONC harlestown, were issued.  This continued through the first week of June
2 CONC .
2 CONT
2 CONT Also on May 14th, Increase Mather returned from England, bringing with h
2 CONC im a new charter and the new governor, Sir William Phips.
2 CONT
2 CONT Now the trouble took a new turn.  A woman in Andover was sick of some f
2 CONC ever not understood, so her husband posted down to Salem Village to get a c
2 CONC ouple of the "afflicted children" to come up and say who was bewitching h
2 CONC er.  They came and trouble spread like wildfire.  Dudley Bradstreet, so
2 CONC n of the old Governor, was the magistrate, and at first went along with t
2 CONC he excitement, but, when some fifty persons had been arrested, he decli
2 CONC ned to go further.  He was, of course, suspected, so he and his wife an
2 CONC d brother fled and escaped.  A dog supposed to have been bewitched by t
2 CONC he brother was executed!
2 CONT
2 CONT May 18th, Mary Easty was released from prison.  Yet, due to the outcrie
2 CONC s and protests of her accusers, she was arrested a second time.
2 CONT
2 CONT May 27th, a new court of primarly Boston men was appointed by the new G
2 CONC overnor, Sir William Phips.  The special Court of Oyer and Terminer com
2 CONC prised of seven judges to try the witchcraft cases.  Appointed were Lie
2 CONC utenant Governor William Stoughon, Nathaniel Saltonstall, Bartholomew G
2 CONC edney, Peter Sergeant, Samuel Sewall, Wait Still Winthrop, John Richard
2 CONC s, John Hathorne, and Jonathan Corwin.
2 CONT
2 CONT These magistrates based their judments and evaluations on various kinds o
2 CONC f intangible evidence, including direct confessions, supernatural attri
2 CONC butes (such as "witchmarks", and reactions of the afflicted girls.  Spe
2 CONC ctral evidence, based on the aaumption that the Devil could assume the "
2 CONC specter" of an innocent person, was relied upon despite its controversi
2 CONC al nature.
2 CONT
2 CONT Martha Carrier, John Alden, Wilmott Redd, Elizabeth Howe, and Phillip E
2 CONC nglish were exmined before Hathorne, Corwin, and Gedney on May 31.
2 CONT
2 CONT John Alden, son of the couple John Alden and Priscilla Mullins, was a r
2 CONC esident of Boston when accused by the young girls of Salem of witchcraf
2 CONC t. Alden was arrested and brought to Salem to face the girls. When Alde
2 CONC n approached them in court, the girls who had accused him all fell to t
2 CONC he floor in a faint. Alden then turned to Judge Hathorne and said, "Wha
2 CONC t's the reason you don't fall when I look at you?" Hathorne had no answ
2 CONC er, but he imprisoned Alden anyway. Three months later John Alden manag
2 CONC ed to escape from jail and he was never apprehended.    On June 2nd, th
2 CONC e initial session of the Court of Oyer and Terminer was held.  The cour
2 CONC t held its meetings in the town-house and began its sessions the first w
2 CONC eek in June.  They tried and sentenced Bridget Bishop.
2 CONT
2 CONT Soon after Bridget Bishop's trail, Nathaniel Saltonstall resigned from t
2 CONC he court, dissatisfied with its proceedings.
2 CONT
2 CONT Bridget Bishop was the first to be hung for witchcraft. There is still d
2 CONC ebate today as to whether or not she should be included in the list of S
2 CONC alem witches of 1692. Bridget Bishop had been tried for witchcraft in 1
2 CONC 679 and acquitted. She was a twice-widowed tavern owner, owning "an ord
2 CONC inary" on the road between Salem and Beverly. She served a new and powe
2 CONC rful drink called "rum" to many of the sailors who frequented her place
2 CONC . The sailors also played an evil new game called "shuffleboard that up
2 CONC set many of the neighbors. Bridget wore bright clothes, a major offense i
2 CONC n the eyes of the Puritans of Salem. Bridget apparently was condemned m
2 CONC ore for her lifestyle and for the veiled accusations of prostitution th
2 CONC at cannot be proven or disproven today. Bridget Bishop was hanged June 1
2 CONC 0 in Salem, the first official execution of the Salem witch trails.
2 CONT
2 CONT Following her death, accusations of witchcraft escalated, but the trial
2 CONC s were not unopposed.  Several townspeople signed petitions on behalf o
2 CONC f accused people they believed to be innocent.
2 CONT
2 CONT During this time, two dogs were also hung by the neck at Gallows Hill b
2 CONC ecause one of the girls said they had appeared to her as the Devil's di
2 CONC sciples and gave her the evil eye.    On June 29-30, they tried and sen
2 CONC tenced five more, Rebecca Nurse, Susannah Martin, Sarah Wildes, Sarah G
2 CONC ood, and Elizabeth Howe.
2 CONT
2 CONT The following dialogue is based on the exmination of Sarah Good by Judg
2 CONC es Hathorne and Corwim, from "The Salem Witchcraft Papers", Book II, pa
2 CONC ge 355.
2 CONT
2 CONT What evil spirit have you familiarity with?
2 CONT
2 CONT None.
2 CONT
2 CONT Have you made no contract with the devil?
2 CONT
2 CONT No.
2 CONT
2 CONT Why do you hurt these children?
2 CONT
2 CONT I do not hurt them.  I scorn it.
2 CONT
2 CONT Who do you imploy then to do it?
2 CONT
2 CONT I imploy no body.
2 CONT
2 CONT What creature do you imploy then?
2 CONT
2 CONT No creature.  I am falsely accused.
2 CONT
2 CONT In mid-July an effort to expose witches afflicting his life, Joseph Bal
2 CONC lard of nearby Andover enlisted the aid of the accusing girls of Salem.  T
2 CONC his action marked the beginning of the Andover witch hunt.
2 CONT
2 CONT July 19, Rebecca Nurse (age 70), Susannah Martin, Elizabeth Howe, Sarah G
2 CONC ood, and Sarah Wildes were executed.
2 CONT
2 CONT August 2-6, the court condemned six more, George Jacobs, Sr., Martha Ca
2 CONC rrier, George Burroughs, John and Elizabeth Proctor, and John Willard.
2 CONT
2 CONT All were executed on the nineteenth except Elizabeth Proctor by hanging o
2 CONC n Gallows Hill.
2 CONT
2 CONT The September sitting of the court began the sixth and ended on the sev
2 CONC enteenth. The trial of Mrs. Cory occurred September 10th, and she was c
2 CONC onvicted and sentenced on the same day. Mary Easty, Alice Parker, Ann P
2 CONC udeator, Dorcas Hoar, and Mary Bradbury were also tried and condemmed.
2 CONT
2 CONT Mary Bradbury of Salisbury was found guilty of witchcraft, but managed t
2 CONC o escape the jail before execution. She apparently had assistance in th
2 CONC is from her friends and relatives, she was never re-captured.    By Sep 1
2 CONC 7, Margaret Scott, Wilmott Redd, Samuel Wardwell, Mary Parker, Abigail F
2 CONC aulkner, Rebecca Eames, Mary Lacy and her mother Ann Foster, and Abigai
2 CONC l Hobbs were tried and condemmed.
2 CONT
2 CONT Mary Lacy of Andover was accused of witchcraft and admitted to it. She s
2 CONC aid "me and Martha Carrier did both ride on a stick or pole when we wen
2 CONC t to witch meetings at Salem Village." Ironically, those who confessed t
2 CONC o being witches were not executed, but many of those who denied witchcr
2 CONC aft were hung. Mary Lacy was allowed to go free after her "confession" b
2 CONC ut she had damned Martha Carrier in the process. Martha was hung a few w
2 CONC eeks later.    Mary Lacy's mother, Ann Foster, died in a Salem Dungeon d
2 CONC ue to ill treatment from Sheriff George Corwin.
2 CONT
2 CONT At the September sitting of the court, Giles was arraigned. The followi
2 CONC ng deposition is by one of the girls who accused Giles of witchcraft.  T
2 CONC he document is from the records of the Court of Oyer and Terminer, Sept
2 CONC ember 9, 1692, property of the Supreme Judicial Court, Division of Arch
2 CONC ives and Records Preservation, on deposit at the Essex Institute, Salem
2 CONC , Essex Co, MA.
2 CONT
2 CONT Mercy Lewis v. Giles Cory
2 CONT
2 CONT The Deposition of Mercy lewes agged about 19 years woh testifieth and s
2 CONC aith that on the 14th April 1692 I saw the Apperishtion of Giles Cory c
2 CONC om and aflect me urging me to writ in his book and so he contineued mos
2 CONC t dreadfullly to hurt me by times beating me & almost braking my back t
2 CONC ell the day of his examination being the 19th April and then allso duri
2 CONC ng the time of his examination he did affect and tortor me most greviou
2 CONC sly: and also several times sence urging me vehemently to writ in his b
2 CONC ook and I veryly believe in my heart that Giles Cory is a dreadfull wiz
2 CONC zard for sence he had ben in prison he or his apperance has com and mos
2 CONC t greviously tormented me.
2 CONT
2 CONT Mercy Lewis affirmed to the jury of Inquest. that the above written evi
2 CONC dence: is the truth upon the oath: she has formerly taken in court of O
2 CONC yer & Terminer: Septr 9: 1692
2 CONT
2 CONT He was asked to plead, that is, to appeal to his country, to a jury tri
2 CONC al, which at that time all persons charged with crime must do before a j
2 CONC ury could try them.  He "stood mute," and would not plead. The old Engl
2 CONC ish Law of "Peine forte et dure" furnished but one remedy for this situ
2 CONC ation.  The prisoner should:
2 CONT
2 CONT be remanded to the prison from whence he came and put into a low dark c
2 CONC hamber, and there be laid on his back on the bare floor, naked, unless w
2 CONC hen decency forbids; that there be placed upon his body as great a weig
2 CONC ht as he could bear, and more, that he hath no sustenance, save only on t
2 CONC he first day, three morsels of the worst bread, and the second day thre
2 CONC e droughts of standing water, that should be alternately his daily diet t
2 CONC ill he died, or, till he answered.
2 CONT
2 CONT Giles Cory suffered this rather than to appeal to his countrymen, as he w
2 CONC as fully convinced that he must die anyway, and he was obstinate enough t
2 CONC o cheat the gallows.   So to avoid giving the prosecution any advantage
2 CONC , he would answer nothing, whereupon he was sentenced to be pressed to d
2 CONC eath. Hence, refusing to put himself on trial (no trial actually took p
2 CONC lace).   Giles reportedly was a stubborn, fiery man who realized that h
2 CONC e would not get a fair trial. By not pleading one way or the other, Eng
2 CONC lish law dictated that a person could not be tried, but the penalty for s
2 CONC tanding mute was "slow crushing under weights" until a plea was forthco
2 CONC ming or the person died. His death was the result of his obstinacy and f
2 CONC irmness with scarcely a parallel---certainly not in American annals.
2 CONT
2 CONT On September 17, the Sheriff led Giles to a pit in the open field besid
2 CONC e the jail and before the Court and witnesses in accordance with an Eng
2 CONC lish procedure of the "Peine forte et dure".  They striped Giles of his c
2 CONC lothing, laid him on the ground in the pit, placed boards on his chest, s
2 CONC ix men lifted heavy stones, placing them one by one, on his stomach and c
2 CONC hest. Giles Corey did not cry out, which perplexed Sheriff Corwin whose d
2 CONC uty it was to squeeze a confession from the old man.
2 CONT
2 CONT After two days, Giles was asked three times to plead innocent or guilty t
2 CONC o witchcraft, to which he would say more weight. "Do you confess?" the S
2 CONC heriff cried over and over. More and more rocks were piled onto him, an
2 CONC d the Sheriff, from time to time, would stand on the boulders staring d
2 CONC own at Corey's bulging eyes. Robert Calef, who was a witness along with o
2 CONC ther townsfolk, later said, "In the pressing, Giles Corey's tongue was p
2 CONC ressed out of his mouth; the Sheriff, with his cane, forced it in again
2 CONC ."
2 CONT
2 CONT Three mouthfuls of bread and water were fed to the old man during his m
2 CONC any hours of pain. Finally, Giles Corey cried out at Sheriff Corwin, "D
2 CONC amn you. I curse you and Salem!" Giles Corey died a few seconds later.
2 CONT
2 CONT Sewell's diary states, under date of Monday, September 19, 1692:
2 CONT
2 CONT About noon at Salem, Giles Cory was pressed to death for standing mute; m
2 CONC uch pains was used with him two days, one after another, by the court a
2 CONC nd Captain Gardner of Nantucket who had been of his acquaintance, but a
2 CONC ll in vain.
2 CONT
2 CONT In the whole history of English law very few people had had the fortitu
2 CONC de to "stand mute" and endure a penalty expressly designed to discourag
2 CONC e such obstinacy. This is the only instance in the history of New Engla
2 CONC nd where this law was applied.  The execution of Giles Cory by this pro
2 CONC cess had nothing to do with witchcraft.  If he had refused to plead to a c
2 CONC harge of burglary, the penalty would have been the same.
2 CONT
2 CONT Except in the cases of treason, conviction could not be obtained on a p
2 CONC risoner who stood mute. With out conviction his property could not be c
2 CONC onfiscated by the crown or provincial government.  Many of Corey's frie
2 CONC nds believed he remained silent in court because his conviction for the c
2 CONC ame would have meant the forfeiture of his estate. Otherwise, the Sheri
2 CONC ff would confiscate it. But the fact is that he had executed a deed bef
2 CONC ore this to his sons-in-law.  Civil and criminal charges had followed h
2 CONC im most of his life.
2 CONT
2 CONT The day following Cory's death, Thomas Putnam sent to Judge Sewall the f
2 CONC ollowing communication:
2 CONT
2 CONT Last night my daughter Ann was grievously tormented by witches, threate
2 CONC ning that she should be pressed to death before Giles Corey, but throug
2 CONC h the goodness of a gracious God, she had, at last, a little respite.  W
2 CONC hereupon there appeared unto her (she said) a man in a winding sheet wh
2 CONC o told her that Giles Corey had murdered by pressing him to death with h
2 CONC is feet;  but that the devil then appeared unto him and convenanted wit
2 CONC h him and promised him that he should not be hanged.  The apparition sa
2 CONC id, God hardened his heart that he should not hearken to the advice of t
2 CONC he court, and so die an easy death; because, as it said, it must be don
2 CONC e to him as he had done to me.  The apparition also said that Giles Cor
2 CONC ey was carried to the court for this and that the jury had found the mu
2 CONC rder; and that her father knew the man and the thing was done before sh
2 CONC e was born.
2 CONT
2 CONT On Sep 21, Dorcas Hoar was the first of those pleading innocent to conf
2 CONC ess.  Her
2 CONT execution was delayed.
2 CONT
2 CONT For the forth and last time, the procession left Salem jail for the pla
2 CONC ce of
2 CONT execution of those persons condemned for witchcraft, on Thursday, Septe
2 CONC mber 22d. There were eight victims this time.  Samuel Wardwell of Andov
2 CONC er was the only man to thus suffer, the women were Mrs. Martha Cory, wi
2 CONC fe of Giles Cory, Alice Parker, wife of John Parker, and Ann Pudeator, w
2 CONC idow of Jacob Pudeator, all of Salem, Mary (Towne) Easty, sister of Reb
2 CONC ecca Nurse and wife of Isaac Easty of Topsfield, Margaret Scott, widow o
2 CONC f Benjamin Scott of Rowley, aged about seventy-five, Wilmot Reed ("Mamm
2 CONC y Red"), wife of Samuel Reed, of Marblehead, and widow Mary Parker of A
2 CONC ndover.  Upon the ladder, Mrs. Cory, protesting her innocence, conclude
2 CONC d her life with an earnest prayer. After the sheriff had done his part i
2 CONC n the affair, Rev. Nicholas Noyes, of Salem, turned toward the suspende
2 CONC d bodies of the victims, and said: "What a sad thing it is to see eight f
2 CONC irebrands of hell hanging there."
2 CONT
2 CONT After 20 people had been executed in the Salem witch hunt, Thomas Bratt
2 CONC le wrote a letter on October 8th, criticizing the witchcraft trials.  T
2 CONC his letter had great impact on Governor Philps, who ordered that relian
2 CONC ce on spectral and intangible evidence no longer be allowed in trials.
2 CONT
2 CONT On Oct 29, Governor Philps dissolved the Court of Oyer and Terminer.
2 CONT
2 CONT The General Court of the colony created the Superior Court on Nov 25 to t
2 CONC ry the remaining witchcraft cases which took place in May 1693. This ti
2 CONC me no one was convicted.
2 CONT
2 CONT In the spring of 1693, Sir William Phips, Governor of Massachusetts, li
2 CONC berated 168 people in Salem's Witch Dungeon who awaiting the hangman's n
2 CONC oose. Several of these people died shortly thereafter from their neglec
2 CONC t and abuse while in the dungeon.    By 1710, the General Court had beg
2 CONC un to "reverse some of the convictions, judgments and attainders and de
2 CONC clare them null and void," and in the next year or two some compensatio
2 CONC n, if inadequate, had been paid to the families of some of the sufferer
2 CONC s.  The First Church in Salem erased from their records and blotted out t
2 CONC he excommunication of Rebecca Nurse and Giles Cory.
2 CONT
2 CONT The Reverend Samuel Parris, after a long acrimonious struggle with the m
2 CONC en whose wives, mothers, and friends he had helped to drag to the gallo
2 CONC ws, was driven from the Village in 1697, and, after unimportant service i
2 CONC n the frontier towns, died in Sudbury in 1720.  His wife died and was b
2 CONC uried in Danvers before he left that parish.
2 CONT
2 CONT One of the young girls, Ann Putnam confessed her fraud 14 years later a
2 CONC t the age of 26. She had her minister read the confession at Sunday ser
2 CONC vice "It was a great delusion of Satan that deceived me in that sad tim
2 CONC e whereby I justly fear I have been instrumental to bring upon myself a
2 CONC nd this land the guilt of innocent blood."    The following is a list o
2 CONC f those hanged at Gallows Hill, Salem, Massachusetts for witchcraft:
2 CONT
2 CONT Name                                  Village or Town Date
2 CONT Bridget Bishop                     Salem 10-Jun-1692
2 CONT Sarah Good                         Salem Village (Danvers) 19-Jul-1692
2 CONT Susanna Martin                    Amesbury 19-Jul-1692
2 CONT Elizabeth Howe                    Ipswich 19-Jul-1692
2 CONT Rebecca Nurse (or Nourse)   Salem Village (Danvers)    19-Jul-1692
2 CONT Sarah Wildes                       Topsfield 19-Jul-1692
2 CONT George Jacobs                     Salem Village (Danvers) 19-Aug-1692
2 CONT Martha Carrier                      Andover 19-Aug-1692
2 CONT Reverend George Burroughs  Wells, Maine                   19-Aug-1692
2 CONT John Proctor                        Salem Village (Peabody) 19-Aug-1692
2 CONC
2 CONT
2 CONT
2 CONT John Willard                         Salem Village (Danvers) 19-Aug-169
2 CONC 2
2 CONT Martha Corey                        Salem Village (Peabody) 22-Sep-1692
2 CONC
2 CONT
2 CONT
2 CONT Mary Easty                           Topsfield 22-Sep-1692
2 CONT Alice Parker                         Salem 22-Sep-1692
2 CONT Mary Parker                         Andover 22-Sep-1692
2 CONT Ann Prudeater                      Salem 22-Sep-1692
2 CONT Wilmot Reed                        Marblehead 22-Sep-1692
2 CONT Margaret Scott                     Rowley 22-Sep-1692
2 CONT Samuel Wardwell                  Andover 22-Sep-1692
2 CONT
2 CONT While the term "Salem Witches" is common nowadays, it ignores the fact t
2 CONC hat most of the accused were not from Salem. The jail and site of execu
2 CONC tions were in Salem, but the accused were mostly from other towns and v
2 CONC illages in the area. Only 10 the 134 who were accused and were held in S
2 CONC alem's Jail were from Salem Towne. The complete count was:
2 CONT
2 CONT   1  Amesbury
2 CONT 38  Andover
2 CONT   2  Boxford
2 CONT   1  Boston
2 CONT   6  Billerica
2 CONT   6  Beverly
2 CONT   3  Charlestown
2 CONT   1  Chelmsford
2 CONT   3  Gloucester
2 CONT   3  Haverhill
2 CONT   1  Great Island
2 CONT   2  Marblehead
2 CONT   7  Lynn
2 CONT   1  Malden
2 CONT   4  Reading
2 CONT   1  Rowley
2 CONT   1  Romney Marsh (today called Revere)
2 CONT   1  Salisbury
2 CONT 10  Salem
2 CONT 30  Salem Village (today this is part of Danvers and of Peabody)
2 CONT   7  Topsfield & Ipswich
2 CONT   1  Wells, Maine
2 CONT   3  Woburn
2 CONT
2 CONT In addition to the 134 above, another 34 were accused and in various ja
2 CONC ils awaiting trial when Governor Phips released all the prisoners.
2 CONT
2 CONT The only person who seemed to profit from the witchcraft hysteria was S
2 CONC heriff George Corwin who confiscated property and pocketed fees collect
2 CONC ed from the accused and their relatives.
2 CONT
2 CONT It is remarkable that the original 552 documents recording court testim
2 CONC ony during the witchcraft trial have been preserved and are still store
2 CONC d by the Peabody Essex Museum.
2 CONT
2 CONT There is a popular theory today that mouldy rye was the real cause of t
2 CONC he Salem hysteria. An article in "Science Magazine," April 2, 1976, by L
2 CONC inda, Caporael, a University of California graduate student, reveals th
2 CONC at the physical afflictions of the accusing girls might have been cause
2 CONC d by "Convulsive Ergotism", a disorder resulting from the ingestion of c
2 CONC ontaminated rye grain. "Rye, which grows in low, wet ground, yields erg
2 CONC ot," wrote Miss Caporael. Rye was known to be a staple in the diets of t
2 CONC he Salem Puritans. Rye was a common ingredient of bread and was eaten a
2 CONC s a cereal. Judge Sewall's diary for the summer of 1692 states that the r
2 CONC ye harvest was during a time that was "rainy and warm, hot and stormy." E
2 CONC rgot (claviceps purpura) is spread by a fungus that causes symptoms of h
2 CONC allucination, violent fits, choking, pinching, itching, a crawling sens
2 CONC ation in the skin and muscular contractions. Linda Caporael adds that "
2 CONC females and children are more likely to get ergot poisoning than the ma
2 CONC les."
2 CONT
1 SOUR @S29@
2 PAGE page 132
1 BIRT
2 DATE BEF 19 AUG 1621
2 PLAC Northhampton, Northhamptonshire, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE 19 SEP 1692
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
2 NOTE Giles was the son of Giles and Elizabeth Cory.  His birth recorded, par
3 CONC ish of St. Sepulchre.
3 CONT
3 CONT A short description of Giles Cory is given in "Genealogical and Family H
3 CONC istory of the State of New Hampshire".  It is full of inaccuracies, but i
3 CONC s a good short overview.
3 CONT
3 CONT The first on record in this country was Giles Corey, who was residing i
3 CONC n Salem,  Massachusetts, in 1649, with his wife Margaret.  Their daught
3 CONC er Deliverance was  born there August 5, 1658.  The mother died previou
3 CONC s to 1664, and on April 11 of  that year Giles  Corey married (second" M
3 CONC ary Britz[sic].  She died August 28,  1684, at the age of sixty-three y
3 CONC ears, and he had a third wife, Martha, who was  admitted to the church i
3 CONC n Salem Village (now Danvers", April 27, 1690.  She was the victim of t
3 CONC he terrible witchcraft delusion in Salem, and was apprehended in  March
3 CONC , 1692, and hung on the following Thursday (She was not hung  until Thu
3 CONC rday, September 22, 1692).  In a very short time her husband was also  a
3 CONC rrested and was imprisoned, in April.  He was kept in confinement and m
3 CONC oved  about from one jail to another, going to Boston and back again to S
3 CONC alem, and was  finally executed (The word executed is not correct, he w
3 CONC as tortured  to death." on September 19, 1692, in the most horrible man
3 CONC ner ever used on the continent.  He was pressed to death, being the onl
3 CONC y one who ever suffered that  form of execution in Massachusetts.  He w
3 CONC as a member of the first church of  Salem, from which he was excommunic
3 CONC ated the day preceding his death.  Such was  the tenacity of the execra
3 CONC ble witchcraft delusion in Salem that this sentence  was not expunged f
3 CONC rom the church record until twenty years after, and a period  of eleven y
3 CONC ears elapsed before justice was done to the memory of his wife in the D
3 CONC anvers church.  Though a petition for relief appears in the Essex recor
3 CONC ds on  behalf of the children, no mention of their names is found excep
3 CONC t of Martha, who  made the petition in behalf of the family, and Delive
3 CONC rance before mentioned.  It  is probable that there were several sons. J
3 CONC onathan and Thomas Corey are  mentioned as having been at Chelmsford at a
3 CONC n early period
3 CONT
3 CONT The following is taken from the "Cory Family Newsletter", Volume 7, num
3 CONC ber 3, Sep 1992.  It contains what I feel are several errors.
3 CONT
3 CONT Giles Cory was born ca 1619 in England.  There is, I am told but not ha
3 CONC ve had  the privilege of obtaining a copy of his baptismal record from E
3 CONC ngland.  When he  arrived in the Americas is not certain but there is e
3 CONC vidence he was in Salem in  1640.  There are quite a few entries in the c
3 CONC ourt documents as to his behavior,  it was not all good, but in those t
3 CONC imes any accusation was an offense against  the state.  Giles married f
3 CONC irst, Margaret, the mother of all his children. We  believe they were m
3 CONC arried in England.  Giles had no male heirs (I don't believe this   to b
3 CONC e true.  It seem to be predicated on his will, which is not enough just
3 CONC ification to  make that statement).
3 CONT
3 CONT There were Martha, married William Cleaves in 1675.  They had three chi
3 CONC ldren.   Martha died in 1683.  Margaret, also married William Cleaves (
3 CONC No, this was William  Clements." on 18-May-1683. They had five children
3 CONC .  After William died, Margaret  married Jonathan Biles. Deliverance bo
3 CONC rn 5-Aug-1658, married Henry Cross (No, this  was Henry Crosby." 5-Jun-
3 CONC 1683. Elizabeth married John Moulton.  Mary, born 1653 married John Par
3 CONC ker.  She died  before Feb-1697.  They had seven children.
3 CONT
3 CONT Giles second wife was Mary Brite, they were married 11 April 1673 (No, t
3 CONC his is  recorded twice in the Salem V.R. as 1664). She died 27-Aug-1684
3 CONC .  She is buried in  Salem Grave yard.  Giles third wife was Martha Pen
3 CONC oyer, widow of Henry Rich.  They  were married in 1685 (This is more li
3 CONC kely 1690, when she was admitted to the church). Martha had a son Thoma
3 CONC s.  He shows up as a petitioner for loss and damages resulting  from hi
3 CONC s mother being hanged illegally during the witch trials.  He was awarde
3 CONC d Ģ50 on  29-Jun-1723. "Corys of America" mentioned that this may have b
3 CONC een Thomas Rich,   born Sep 1642(?) in England.
3 CONT
3 CONT One source, ROLLAND COREY, says that Giles Cory came to Salem, MA in 16
3 CONC 44.
3 CONT
3 CONT Giles Corey, Antram's boy, first appears in Salem Court records, as a w
3 CONC itness in the court, July 11, 1644, against Obadiah Govis, servant of T
3 CONC homas Trusler, who was ordered to be severely whipped for the
3 CONT
3 CONT Giles was listed as a watchman in 1647.
3 CONT
3 CONT In the Salem court, June 28, 1649, Giles Corey was fined for stealing w
3 CONC heat, powder, soap, flax, tobacco, bacon, pork, butter and knives from M
3 CONC r.  Curwin and Thomas Anthrom.
3 CONT
3 CONT The use of the phrase "Antram's boy" is unclear to me.  In 1644 Giles w
3 CONC ould have been 23 years old.  The word "boy" does not fit this interpre
3 CONC tation well.  In the above court record Thomas Anthrom is mentioned.  T
3 CONC he phase would also fit if Giles were the servant or indentured to Thom
3 CONC as Anthrom. One or both of these spellings would then be incorrect.
3 CONT
3 CONT In "The History of Salem", Vol. II in a footnote at the bottom of page 1
3 CONC 93, it says:
3 CONT
3 CONT Giles Corey was born about 1619; married, first Margaret ______; second
3 CONC , Mary  Brite April 11, 1673 (This is an error, her name was Mary Brigh
3 CONC t and she was married   April 11, 1664); third, Martha ______; pressed t
3 CONC o  death Sept. 19, 1692; wife Martha   was hung as a witch Sept. 22, 16
3 CONC 92; Children:
3 CONT  1. Deliverance, born in Salem  Aug. 5, 1658; married Henry Crosby June 5
3 CONC , 1683;
3 CONT  2. Margaret; married William  Cleaves (Spelled Clements in the Vital S
3 CONC tatics of both
3 CONT    Marblehead and Beverly) of Beverly;
3 CONT  3. Elizabeth; married John Moulton of Salem.
3 CONT
3 CONT Mr. Corey lived in what is now Peabody about ten rods westerly of the W
3 CONC est Peabody   Junction railroad station, adjoining the southerly side o
3 CONC f the location of the Salem and   Lowell railroad.  Caleb Moore stated t
3 CONC hat when he was in Virginia with his father, the   latter bought Mary, C
3 CONC ory's second wife, out of a London ship.
3 CONT
3 CONT Giles brought suit 26-Feb-1650 [26 (12) 1650]
3 CONT
3 CONT Feb. 18, 1661/2, Giles Corey, in consideration of some of his land havi
3 CONC ng been made use of for a highway, was granted a small strip of about t
3 CONC wo acres of land near that which was Roger Morey's meadow, and also a s
3 CONC pot or hole of meadow near Henry Phelps' house and near his own meadow.
3 CONC
3 CONT
3 CONT
3 CONT
3 CONT On April 11, 1664 he married Mary Bright.  Margaret must have died betw
3 CONC een 1658 and 1664, "Corys of America" lists the date about 1663. Mary "
3 CONC was bought out a London ship in Virginia by the father of Caleb More; w
3 CONC ho testified to this and to her good character
3 CONT when she was accused in 1678".
3 CONT
3 CONT Salem December Ye 10th 1678. -Caleb More aged thirty yeares: or thare a
3 CONC bout testifieth that he being with his father in Virginia: When his fat
3 CONC her bought Mary which in now Ye wife of Gyels Cory; out of a London shi
3 CONC p: and douth testify that Ye hole ships company gau har the caretar of o
3 CONC nest Seuel woman: and douth further testify thatt wither in the the tim
3 CONC e of couming home in Ye ketch or while she liued with my father or senc s
3 CONC he has ben Cory's Wife. that hee did neuer hare har Sware: or See har o
3 CONC uer taken in drinck: or Spake Ryproch fuly of har naibors: or of any bo
3 CONC dy else: nitha did I euer hare any body else Saye any such things of ha
3 CONC r.
3 CONT
3 CONT Giles Cory signed a petition Oct 10, 1667, dealing with "Constable Watc
3 CONC hes" by farmers.
3 CONT
3 CONT About 1670, his son John or Jonathan was born.
3 CONT
3 CONT He deposed June 17, 1672, [17 (4" 1672] age about 55 years.
3 CONT
3 CONT November of 1675, Giles Cory is the subject of a testimony by Mrs. Mary C
3 CONC ory.
3 CONT
3 CONT About the last of November, 1675, as Mrs. Mary Corey testified, Elizabe
3 CONC th, wife of Zachariah Goodale, told her that the latter's brother Jacob G
3 CONC oodale had been to Zachariah's house and got into the cellar and took s
3 CONC ome apples.  Zachariah was then coming in with a log of wood, and layin
3 CONC g it down, he took a stick and "pade (pade - this is the Old English wo
3 CONC rd, paid, meaning to chastise or beat.) hem to som porpos."  About ten d
3 CONC ays later, in the beginning of December, Giles Corey unreasonably beat J
3 CONC acob with a stick of about an inch in diameter nearly a hundred blows i
3 CONC n the presence of Elisha Kebee, who told Corey that he would knock him d
3 CONC own if he did not forbear.  About ten days later, Corey went to the hou
3 CONC se of Zachariah Goodale, and told him that his brother Jacob Goodale ha
3 CONC d had a fall.  He was afraid that he had broken his arm, and desired hi
3 CONC m to take Jacob to Mrs. Mole's in the town.  Jacob was then thirty-four y
3 CONC ears of age, and up to that time he had been lusty.  Now, Jacob went "v
3 CONC ery ravel (ravel - as though confused)" and stooping, and he was very p
3 CONC ale and his eyes sunken. Thereupon, Zachariah went to Corey's house, an
3 CONC d saw Jacob, who was there. The roads were slippery, and Corey said tha
3 CONC t his horse was not caulked, so he could not go with him.  Jacob went s
3 CONC o badly, Zachariah asked him if he had any other hurt than his arm, but h
3 CONC e would not tell.  Zachariah then requested that some one might go with h
3 CONC im; whereupon Goody Corey went with him.
3 CONT
3 CONT (Goody - [from goodwife] a woman, especially an old woman or housewife, o
3 CONC f lowly social status: formerly used as in New England, as a title with t
3 CONC he surname)
3 CONT
3 CONT Jacob died a few days later, and inquest was held.  The jury consisted o
3 CONC f Nathaniel Felton, Francis Nurse, Anthony Buxton, Michael Shafilin, Je
3 CONC remiah Meacham, John Traske, Thomas Small, Samuel Very, Thomas Preston, J
3 CONC ohn Cooke, Joshua Rea and Eleazer Giles, and they made the following re
3 CONC port: "we find several wrongs he hath had in his body as upon his left a
3 CONC rm and upon his right thigh a great bruise which is very much swold and u
3 CONC pon the reins of his back in color differing from the other parts of hi
3 CONC s body we caused an incision to be made much bruised and run with a jel
3 CONC ly and the skin broke upon the outside of each buttock." For his abuse C
3 CONC orey was fined.
3 CONT
3 CONT In July of 1678, Giles Cory is once again of the subject of a court act
3 CONC ion. In "The History of Salem", Vol. III, pages 118 and 119, it says:
3 CONT
3 CONT A small house belonging to John Procter, which stood on the northerly s
3 CONC ide of Lowell Street, about one hundred and fifty rods easterly from th
3 CONC e Georgetown branch of the Boston and Maine Railroad, was partially bur
3 CONC ned in July, 1678.  The roof and that part of the walls above two feet u
3 CONC pward from the upper floor was burned away.  This occurred about two ho
3 CONC urs before day, and but for the timely appearance and strenuous efforts o
3 CONC f John Phelps and Thomas Fuller, who passing, it would have been wholly d
3 CONC estroyed.  Procter suspected that Giles Corey set the fire.  A warrant w
3 CONC as issued on the twenty-fourth for his appearance in court, as he had d
3 CONC one so many ill things to his neighbors, --threatened and suggested fir
3 CONC es, etc.  He proved that he was at home and abed all the night of the f
3 CONC ire, and was discharged.
3 CONT
3 CONT On August 27, 1684, his second wife Mary, died at the age of 63 (as is m
3 CONC arked on her grave stone".  He married for a third time, April 27, 1690
3 CONC , to Martha.  Martha was the admitted to the church at Salem Village, n
3 CONC ow Danvers, where Giles lived.
3 CONT
3 CONT In "Mayflower Families", Volume III, page 134, it mentions that Martha P
3 CONC enoyer married Henry Rich  at Stanford in December 1680 and later marri
3 CONC ed Giles Cory of Salem.
3 CONT
3 CONT Between 1664 and 1692 Giles Cory witnessed the deed when a neighbor, Ca
3 CONC pt. Thomas Flint, bought the house owned by William Dounton for Ģ100. W
3 CONC illiam Dounton was Thomas Flint's father-in-law.
3 CONT
3 CONT Both Giles and Martha were victims of the Salem witchcraft trials. Mart
3 CONC ha was convicted and hanged for witchcraft on September 22, 1692. Giles C
3 CONC ory was pressed to death for refusing to plead on September 19, 1692.
3 CONT
3 CONT His will is presented in several works:
3 CONT
3 CONT Written on the twenty forth day of April anno dom one thousand six hund
3 CONC red ninety two, by Gyles Coree (his mark and seale".  Personally appear
3 CONC ed and did acknowledge this instrument to bee his act and voluntary dee
3 CONC d.  Signed sealed and delivered Ipswch July Ye 25th 1692.
3 CONT
3 CONT The will so states:
3 CONT
3 CONT In consideration of which and for ye fatherly Love and Affection wch I h
3 CONC ave & doe beare unto my beloved soņe in Law William Cleeves of Ye town o
3 CONC f Beaverly. in ye aboves county and to my soņe in Law John Moulton of y
3 CONC e town of Salem in sd county both yeomen.
3 CONT
3 CONT The will goes on to state that Giles gives to these sons in Laws all hi
3 CONC s property, real and personal including stock, lands and meadow, house, b
3 CONC edding, money, and all movable estate.
3 CONT
3 CONT After Giles death, Capt. Thomas Flint bought his property to add to his e
3 CONC state.  This house was located "in the triangle west of the West Peabod
3 CONC y Station and north of Pine St." The 1692 Salem map Shows the Giles Cor
3 CONC y property was located across the road from the Thomas Flint property.
3 CONT
3 CONT                                                    Salem Witch Craft Tr
3 CONC ials
3 CONT
3 CONT The following is taken in part from:
3 CONT   The "Cory Family Newsletter", Volume 7, number 3,  Sep 1992,
3 CONT   "The History of Salem", Volume III, pages 286-293,
3 CONT   "The Witchcraft Episode", pages 36-57,
3 CONT   "Salem In The Seventeenth Century", Chapter XXV,
3 CONT   "The Witches at Salem, 1692", by Dick Eastman on the Compuserve Genea
3 CONC logy Forum
3 CONT   "Witches and Wizards", by Robert Ellis Cahill former Essex County (Ma
3 CONC ss.) Sheriff and
3 CONT    Keeper of the Salem Jail.
3 CONT
3 CONT The opprobrious epithet of witch-city which has tenaciously clung to Sa
3 CONC lem since 1692 is due to the fact that the witch trials and executions t
3 CONC ook place in that town. The source of the excitement which resulted in t
3 CONC he death for alleged witchcraft of twenty persons within a year, lay in t
3 CONC he a neighboring settlement, now the town of Danvers. At the time it wa
3 CONC s a parish of Salem Town, known as Salem Village.
3 CONT
3 CONT Difficulties and acrimonious disputes over church affairs had long prev
3 CONC ailed in this community, which reached a climax when the Rev. Samuel Pa
3 CONC rris was finally chosen, in 1689, to take charge of the parish affairs.  P
3 CONC arris appears to have entered the ministry somewhat late in life and ha
3 CONC d spent considerable time in the West Indies in business pursuits.  He b
3 CONC rought with him to Salem Village two native servants, or slaves of West I
3 CONC ndian and African blood, known as Indian John and Tituba his wife---the i
3 CONC mmediate instigators of the events which were soon to follow.
3 CONT
3 CONT Parris' difficulties began at once.  He was at odds with his parishione
3 CONC rs over salary, his parsonage, church rates, and in fact, over all matt
3 CONC ers pertaining to the conduct of his office.  This led to a degree of b
3 CONC itterness in the community unusual even in those times of agitated publ
3 CONC ic feeling.  Apart from church affairs, there were also many disputes a
3 CONC s to land rights, and personal animosities were widespread and rancorou
3 CONC s.  The setting was complete for an emotional outbreak.
3 CONT
3 CONT In the long and bitter winter of 1691-92, some young women and girls at S
3 CONC alem Village had some meetings to learn palmistry and fortune-telling f
3 CONC rom Tituba.  She was skilled in necromancy and various magic arts---per
3 CONC haps African in origin, perhaps practiced by Indians---and found apt pu
3 CONC pils in the children, who soon acquired proficiency in their use. Titub
3 CONC a claimed to know how to discover witches and the children may have rea
3 CONC d about evidences of witchcraft, but at any rate those impressionable y
3 CONC oung people soon began to act queerly and have spasms and fits.
3 CONT
3 CONT These sessions apparently fired the imaginations of the girls, several o
3 CONC f whom later started performing nightmarish fits and telling tales of w
3 CONC itchcraft and of being possessed of evil spirits amongst them in Salem.  O
3 CONC n 20-Jan-1692, nine-year-old Elizabeth Parris and eleven-year-old Abiga
3 CONC il Willams began to exhibit strange behavior, such as blaphemous scream
3 CONC ing, convulsive seizures, trance-line states and mysterious spells.  Wi
3 CONC thin a short time, several other Salem Girls began to demonstrate simil
3 CONC ar behavior.
3 CONT
3 CONT Doubtless at the outset, all this was innocent enough, until it attract
3 CONC ed the attention of the elders who were at first mystified and then ala
3 CONC rmed. Instead of keeping the children quietly at home and breaking up t
3 CONC he meetings, their parents called in the local physician, Dr. Griggs.  T
3 CONC he doctor, who knew nothing about nerves and believed in witchcraft, fi
3 CONC nally decided, as was usual when the diagnosis was in doubt, that the a
3 CONC ctions of the girls in their fits and contortions could only be explain
3 CONC ed on the basis of witchcraft.
3 CONT
3 CONT This group, know as the afflicted children, included:
3 CONT
3 CONT   1. Elizabeth Parris, nine years old, daughter of the Reverend Samuel P
3 CONC arris.
3 CONT
3 CONT   2. Abigail Williams, eleven years old, a niece of Mr. Parris and memb
3 CONC er of the
3 CONT   household.
3 CONT
3 CONT   3. Ann Putnam, twelve years old, daughter of Sergeant Thomas Putnam, c
3 CONC lerk of the
3 CONT    parish.
3 CONT
3 CONT   4. Mercy Lewis, seventeen years old, who had been in the family of th
3 CONC e Reverend
3 CONT   George Burroughts while he was at the Village, but now was a servant i
3 CONC n Sergeant
3 CONT   Putnam's family.
3 CONT
3 CONT   5. Mary Wolcott, seventeen years old, daughter of Captain Jonathan Wo
3 CONC lcott, deacon
3 CONT   of the parish.
3 CONT
3 CONT   6. Elizabeth Hubbard, seventeen years old, a niece of Mrs. Griggs, wi
3 CONC fe of the
3 CONT   Village Doctor.
3 CONT
3 CONT   7. Elizabeth Booth, eighteen years old.
3 CONT
3 CONT   8. Susannah Sheldon, eighteen years old.
3 CONT
3 CONT   9. Mary Warren, twenty years old, servant in the family of John Proct
3 CONC or.
3 CONT
3 CONT  10. Sarah Churchill, twenty years old, servant in the family of George J
3 CONC acobs, Sr.
3 CONT
3 CONT These ten, with the occasional help of three married women, Mrs. Ann Pu
3 CONC tnam, mother of one of the girls, a Mrs. Pope, and Goody Bibber from We
3 CONC nham, provided all the initial testimony on which nineteen persons were h
3 CONC anged, and well over a hundred more were cast into prison.
3 CONT
3 CONT During the early spring of 1692 these children continued to have fits a
3 CONC nd convulsions at their meetings and attracted considerable attention t
3 CONC o their antics and actions.  They were all attributed by the people to w
3 CONC itchcraft, and presently the children under this favorable notice began t
3 CONC o extend their activities to the meeting-house on Sundays, crying out t
3 CONC hat they saw yellow birds sitting on the minister's hat, and other simi
3 CONC lar nonsense.  It is not on record that Mr. Parris tried to suppress hi
3 CONC s niece and her friends and some of the parish grew annoyed and stayed a
3 CONC t home.
3 CONT
3 CONT In late February Mr. Parris sent for the neighboring ministers to come t
3 CONC o his house to conduct solemn services to try to rescue the children fr
3 CONC om the clutches of the Evil One. Prayer services and community fasting w
3 CONC ere conducted by Reverand Samuel Parris in hopes of relieving the evil f
3 CONC orces that plagued them. They corroborated the opinion of Dr. Griggs th
3 CONC at the children's actions were the work of witches. In an effort to exp
3 CONC ose the "witches", Indian John baked a witch cake made with rye meal an
3 CONC d the afflicted girl's urine.  This counter-magic was meant to reveal t
3 CONC he identities of the "witches" to the afflicted girls.
3 CONT
3 CONT Pressure was put on the children to tell who afflicted them an they beg
3 CONC an to name various people: Goody Good, Goody Osburn, and the old Indian w
3 CONC oman Tituba, and warrants were obtained for their arrest. They were arr
3 CONC ested on February 28, 1692.
3 CONT
3 CONT On March 1, 1692, John Hathorne and Jonathan Corwin, the magistrates, p
3 CONC roceeded in state to the Village to hear the cases, escorted by the mar
3 CONC shal of Essex and the constables, and stopped at Nathaniel Ingersoll's t
3 CONC avern, but the gathering was so great that they had to adjourn to the m
3 CONC eeting-house.
3 CONT
3 CONT The three accused women were brought to Salem Town and examined by Magi
3 CONC strates Jonathan Corwin and John Hathorne.  Corwin's home, the "Witch H
3 CONC ouse", still stands at the corner of North and Essex Streets in Salem, p
3 CONC roviding guiding tours and tales of the first witchcraft trails.
3 CONT
3 CONT Before an excited crowd, all of whom believed in the possible existence o
3 CONC f witchcraft and in a personal devil, Sarah Good, Sarah Osburn, and Tit
3 CONC uba were brought in.  In spite of the "afflicted children" who charged t
3 CONC hem with hurting them, the first two steadfastly maintained that they h
3 CONC ad made no compact with the Devil, had not hurt the children, and were i
3 CONC nnocent; but the surprising thing is that Tituba admitted that she did s
3 CONC erve the Devil; that her fellow prisoners were witches; also that they r
3 CONC ode around on broomsticks accompanied by familiar spirits and did all s
3 CONC orts of injury.  Tibuba confessed to seeing the devil who appeared to h
3 CONC er "sometimes like a hog and sometimes like a great dog".  What's more, T
3 CONC ituba testified that there was a conpiracy of witches at work in Salem. F
3 CONC or five days the examination continued, and then the magistrates commit
3 CONC ted all three of the women to the jail in Boston.
3 CONT
3 CONT The girls, under the lead of the elder girl, started to tell lies about d
3 CONC ifferent town folks which included Witchcraft accusations.
3 CONT
3 CONT Over the next weeks, other townspeople came forward and testified that t
3 CONC hey, too, had been harmed by or had seen strange apparitions of some of t
3 CONC he community members.  As the witch hunt continued, accusations were ma
3 CONC de against many different people.
3 CONT
3 CONT Frequently denonuced were women whose behavior or economic circumstance
3 CONC s were somehow disturbing to the social order and conventions of the ti
3 CONC me.  Some of the accused had previous records of criminal activity, inc
3 CONC luding withchcraft, but others were faithful churchgoers and people of h
3 CONC igh standing in the community.
3 CONT
3 CONT Sarah Osborne and Sarah Dustin were both convicted of witchcraft and se
3 CONC ntenced to be hung.  Both died in the Salem Dungeon from exposure, ill t
3 CONC reatment and lack of adequate food before the sentences could be carrie
3 CONC d out.  It is also said that Sarah Osborne died two months later, May 1
3 CONC 0, in the Boston jail.
3 CONT
3 CONT Sarah Good was tried and convicted in June and hanged on the nineteenth o
3 CONC f July, while Tituba lay in jail over a year and was finally sold as a s
3 CONC lave for her board bill, as the Reverend Samuel Parris, her master, ref
3 CONC used to redeem her.
3 CONT
3 CONT John Willard early assisted in arresting the accused, but he had expres
3 CONC sed sympathy with those under condemnation, and said, "Hang them, they t
3 CONC hey are all witches."  It was latter reported that Mercy Lewis and Mary W
3 CONC alcott, while investigating an illness in the Wilkins family, that they "
3 CONC saw the apparitions of Sarah Buckley and John Willard upon the throat a
3 CONC nd breast of Henry Wilkins," and saw them press and choke him until he d
3 CONC ied.
3 CONT
3 CONT A warrant for the arrest of Willard was issued May 10th on complaint of T
3 CONC homas Fuller and others; but he could not be located until the eighteen
3 CONC th, when he was produced in court, having been found in Groton.  He was g
3 CONC iven a preliminary examination at Beadle's Tavern, in Salem, at which t
3 CONC he deposition of Mrs. Ann Putnam was probably put in evidence.  The dep
3 CONC osition concerned Willard, but finished with these words:
3 CONT
3 CONT . . . Joseph Fuller's apparition also the same day came to me and told m
3 CONC e that Goody   Corey had killed him.
3 CONT
3 CONT March 19th, a warrant was issued for the arrest of Martha Cory, wife of G
3 CONC iles Cory, and she was immediately taken into custody.  She was examine
3 CONC d before Justices Hathorne and Corwin.  A woman of superior judgment an
3 CONC d discretion, from the beginning she resolutely and persistently denoun
3 CONC ced the whole witchcraft proceedings.  She endeavored to persuade her h
3 CONC usband not to attend the hearings, nor to countenance the prosecutions i
3 CONC n any manner.  It is said that once she took the saddle off his horse t
3 CONC o prevent him from going to an examination.
3 CONT
3 CONT Martha Cory was generally disliked by her neighbors, something that may h
3 CONC ave been a contributing factor to her being accused. Years earlier she h
3 CONC ad given birth to an illegitimate child which apparently had not been w
3 CONC ell-received by the Puritans of Salem.  When the girls first mentioned t
3 CONC he name of Mrs. Cory, Edward Putnam and Ezekiel Cheever went to see her a
3 CONC bout the matter, March 12th.  They saw Ann Putnam on the way, and asked h
3 CONC er what clothes Mrs. Cory wore when her apparition appeared to her as A
3 CONC nn had said.  Ann said that she was so blinded she could not see. Arriv
3 CONC ing at the Cory house, Mrs. Cory said to them, "I know what you have co
3 CONC me for.  You are come to talk with me about being a witch, but I am non
3 CONC e. I cannot help people talking about me."  She inquired whether the af
3 CONC flicted had attempted to describe her clothes.  This last statement was d
3 CONC eemed to be supernatural, and was used in her trial later on.  She told t
3 CONC hem that she did not think there were any witches.
3 CONT
3 CONT Martha Cory, Giles third wife and Rebecca Nurse were arrested March 19t
3 CONC h.  Probably the arrest of Rebecca Nurse was instigated by the enmity o
3 CONC f the Putnams, who, mother and daughter, were among the chief accusers t
3 CONC hough the following months. Overwhelmed by the accusations against two s
3 CONC uch respected persons as Goodwives Cory and Nurse and inflamed by a ser
3 CONC mon preached by Rev. Deodat Lawson, which was interrupted by the antics o
3 CONC f several of the prosecuted children, popular feeling reached a degree o
3 CONC f panic, which precluded any possible control of the rising excitement.
3 CONC
3 CONT
3 CONT
3 CONT
3 CONT On March 28 Elizabeth Proctor was denounced as a witch and on April 3, S
3 CONC arah Cloyce, Rebecca Nurse's sister, was accused of witchcraft.
3 CONT
3 CONT On April 11, the colony as a whole took cognizance of the trouble, and t
3 CONC he Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth and six magistrates, James Russell, J
3 CONC ohn Hathorne, Isaac Addington, Major Samuel Appleton, Captain Samuel Se
3 CONC wall, and Jonathan Corwin appeared in Salem to hold court.
3 CONT
3 CONT Elizabeth Proctor and Sarah Cloyce were examined before Hathorne, Corwi
3 CONC n, Deputy Governor Thomas Danforth, and Captain Samuel Sewall. During t
3 CONC his examination, John Proctor was also accused and imprisoned.
3 CONT
3 CONT In the examination of Martha Cory, the following colloquies occurred:--
3 CONC -
3 CONT
3 CONT Mr. Hathorne.
3 CONT  You are now in the hands of authority.  Tell me, now why you hurt thes
3 CONC e persons?
3 CONT
3 CONT Martha Cory.
3 CONT  I do not.
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  Who doth?
3 CONT
3 CONT Cory.
3 CONT  Pray give me leave to go to prayer. (This request was made at sundry t
3 CONC imes.)
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  We do not send for you to go to prayer, but tell me why hurt these.
3 CONT
3 CONT Cory.
3 CONT  I am an innocent person.  I never had to do with witchcraft since I wa
3 CONC s born.  I
3 CONT  am a gospel woman.
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  How could you tell, then, that the child was bid to observe what cloth
3 CONC es you wore when  some one came to speak with you?
3 CONT
3 CONT (Cheever interrupted her and bid her not begin with a lie, and so Edwar
3 CONC d Putnam declared the matter.)
3 CONT  Who told you that?
3 CONT
3 CONT Cory.
3 CONT  He said the child said.
3 CONT
3 CONT Cheever.
3 CONT  You speak falsely. (Then Edward Putnam read again.)
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  Why did you ask if the child asked what clothes you wore?
3 CONT
3 CONT Cory.
3 CONT  My husband told me the others told.
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  Goodman Cory, did you tell her? (The old man denied that he told her s
3 CONC o.)
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  Did you say your husband told you so?
3 CONT
3 CONT Cory --- no answer.
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  You dare thus lie in all this assembly.  You are now before authority.  I e
3 CONC xpect
3 CONT  the truth.  You promised it.  Speak now and tell who told you what clo
3 CONC thes.
3 CONT
3 CONT Cory.
3 CONT   Nobody.
3 CONT
3 CONT Once the children cried, "A man is whispering in her ear.
3 CONT
3 CONT Hathorne.
3 CONT  What did he say to you?
3 CONT
3 CONT Cory.
3 CONT  We must not believe all that these distracted children say.
3 CONT
3 CONT In his report of this trial, Mr. Parris said: When she bit her lip, sev
3 CONC eral of the afflicted were bitten; when her hands were at liberty, they w
3 CONC ere pinched; etc., etc.
3 CONT
3 CONT Mrs. Cory was badgered by Hathorne, badgered by Corwin, badgered by Rev
3 CONC . Mr. Noyes, badgered by the Marshall and others.
3 CONT
3 CONT Her own husband testified against her, and said that in the evening, si
3 CONC tting by the fire, she asked him to go to bed; he told her that he woul
3 CONC d go to prayer, and when he went to prayer he not utter his desires wit
3 CONC h any sense nor open his mouth to speak; she perceived it and came towa
3 CONC rd him.  In a little while, he prayed.  Sometime in the previousweek, h
3 CONC e brought an ox well out of the woods about noon and the ox lay down in t
3 CONC he yard.  When he went to yoke him, he could not rise, but dragged his h
3 CONC inder parts as if he had been hip shot, but afterward rose.  Cory had a c
3 CONC at the same week which was strangely and suddenly taken sick and he tho
3 CONC ught she would die. Mrs. Cory asked him to knock her in the head, but h
3 CONC e did not, and she recovered.  Mrs. Cory was wont to sit up after he ha
3 CONC d gone to bed, and he had seen her kneel on the hearth, as if she was a
3 CONC t prayer, but heard nothing.
3 CONT
3 CONT During her examination, Mrs. Pope threw a shoe at her and it struck on h
3 CONC er head.
3 CONT
3 CONT After the same absurd scenes and alleged evidence, Sarah Cloyse and Joh
3 CONC n Proctor and his wife Elizabeth, with Rebecca Nurse, Martha Cory, and D
3 CONC orcas Good, the little five-year-old daughter of Sarah, who had been he
3 CONC ld in Salem, were sent to Boston Jail.
3 CONT
3 CONT Rebecca Nurse was first granted a reprieve by the jury in her witchcraf
3 CONC t case. Judge John Hathorne refused to accept the verdict and he convin
3 CONC ced the jury to change their verdict. Judge Hathorne is now known as Sa
3 CONC lem's "witch hanging judge" and also was the great-great-grandfather of N
3 CONC athaniel Hawthorne, author of the "House of Seven Gables." John Hathorn
3 CONC e is buried in the Charter Street "Old Burying Point."
3 CONT
1 BAPM
2 DATE 19 AUG 1621
2 PLAC St. Sepulcher's Church, Northampton, England
1 OCCU Farmer
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 FAMS @F32@
1 FAMS @F33@
1 FAMS @F34@
1 FAMC @F1546@
0 @I71@ INDI
1 NAME Margaret //
2 GIVN Margaret
1 SEX F
1 _UID 1BBD87DADF99C943AC8946A1E4C391C8D91E
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1610
2 PLAC England
1 DEAT
2 DATE BET 1660 AND 1664
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 FAMS @F32@
0 @I72@ INDI
1 NAME Mary /Bright/
2 GIVN Mary
2 SURN Bright
1 SEX F
1 _UID 4C28ECC2D1FD774E9771780B677CC4CCB323
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT SEP 1621
2 PLAC England
1 DEAT
2 DATE 27 AUG 1684
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 BURI
2 PLAC Salem Grave Yard, Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 FAMS @F33@
0 @I73@ INDI
1 NAME Martha /Penoyer/
2 GIVN Martha
2 SURN Penoyer
1 SEX F
1 _UID FC56532ADBF67142B645665D4A61FB4E055F
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 SOUR @S96@
2 DATA
3 TEXT In "Mayflower Families", Volume III, page 134, it mentions
4 CONT that Martha Penoyer married Henry Rich at Stanford in December 1680 and
4 CONC
4 CONT
4 CONT
4 CONT later married Giles Corey of Salem.
1 SOUR @S97@
2 DATA
3 TEXT A footnote in "The History of Salem", Vol. III, page 292 says:
4 CONT
4 CONT       Mrs. Martha Corey was a white woman from England.  She
4 CONT       spoke English well and was supposed to be English.  She had a son
4 CONC ,
4 CONT       mulatto, named Benjamin or Benoni, who was living in 1699, at the a
4 CONC ge of
4 CONT       twenty-two.  She married Giles Corey after the boy was born.
1 BIRT
2 DATE SEP 1615
2 PLAC England
1 DEAT
2 DATE 22 SEP 1692
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 BURI
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 FAMS @F34@
0 @I75@ INDI
1 NAME Mary /Cory/
2 GIVN Mary
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID ECE62C117F2F264ABD43A1D1FB5508423963
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1653
1 DEAT
2 DATE 11 FEB 1697/98
2 _SDATE 11 FEB 1697
1 FAMC @F32@
0 @I76@ INDI
1 NAME Margaret /Cory/
2 GIVN Margaret
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 25BD3A7389ED7F4B8A352F96F2269E70794B
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1655
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F32@
0 @I77@ INDI
1 NAME Martha /Cory/
2 GIVN Martha
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID D285C1EB0F3F9549BC8F9E9311555D7FED0C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1650
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1683
1 FAMC @F32@
0 @I78@ INDI
1 NAME Deliverance /Cory/
2 GIVN Deliverance
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 1A70907C3E2A8243AB79B1B35214F458FD91
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE 5 AUG 1658
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 DEAT
2 DATE AFT 1686
1 FAMC @F32@
0 @I79@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Cory/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID F24CB9CD6BBC2A41A2F1149BB4AECA1BDFCF
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1660
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F32@
0 @I4301@ INDI
1 NAME Giles /Cory/
2 GIVN Giles
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 31AB7248A2F610498715A294F32965C9A3A9
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE 1616/17 - Egideus Cory and 1619 - Giles Cory, both maltsters (a maltste
2 CONC r is one who makes malt from barley for use in making alcoholic beverag
2 CONC es).
2 CONT
2 CONT This imformation was taken from the Cory Family Society Newsletter, Vol 1
2 CONC 2 #4, November 1997.  The format of the chart and the assoicated dates i
2 CONC s confusing.  As it is shown, there are two death dates, 1542 and 1584, f
2 CONC or his father Martyn.  The marriage date for his parents is given as 15
2 CONC 83, which is the same as his death date.
2 CONT
2 CONT The other confusing fact is that he died in 1584, forty years before hi
2 CONC s children were born!  I would guess that this is more likely a birth d
2 CONC ate.
1 SOUR @S98@
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1584
2 PLAC Northhampton, Northhamptonshire, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1584
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F1546@
1 FAMC @F2750@
0 @I4302@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth //
2 GIVN Elizabeth
1 SEX F
1 _UID 22AAE2DB5B521D4C9522563660AF6A0A653C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F1546@
0 @I7692@ INDI
1 NAME Amee /Cory/
2 GIVN Amee
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 19A77EC177A07440A3459EF7D1203A0779E7
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE BEF 1624
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F1546@
0 @I7693@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID CA3151CBAB431849BFAF23423752EA36E25B
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2003
1 BIRT
2 DATE BEF 1630
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F1546@
0 @I7694@ INDI
1 NAME Martyn /Cory/
2 GIVN Martyn
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID E1592A96C3FAE84C8B20E7A54BEDD55D8CA4
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE This imformation was taken from the Cory Family Society Newsletter, Vol 1
2 CONC 2 #4, November 1997.  The format of the chart and the assoicated dates i
2 CONC s confusing.  As it is shown, there are two death dates, 1542 and 1584, f
2 CONC or Martyn.  The marriage date is given as 1583, which is after his deat
2 CONC h or just before it.  The other confusing fact is that their son died i
2 CONC n 1584.
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1543
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1584
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1543
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1584
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F2750@
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I7695@ INDI
1 NAME Katheren /Righton/
2 GIVN Katheren
2 SURN Righton
1 SEX F
1 _UID B39A28DA424694489E2F1016368CEE045A45
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F2750@
0 @I7698@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID F1A26061203F5842BDDFF961AAEF9B81F89A
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE Inherited lands in Weedon Lois Watford and Harpole.
1 SOUR @S287@
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1540
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1540
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I7699@ INDI
1 NAME James /Cory/
2 GIVN James
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 5B9CE2129848F24EB19F2176C09AF3B5F4E2
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I7700@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 80FEAC236C84964788E03D6F0A57C6F64BD0
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1553
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1612
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1612
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 OCCU labourer
2 PLAC Milton Malsor
1 FAMS @F4170@
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I7701@ INDI
1 NAME William /Cory/
2 GIVN William
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID F888780B0408A94FB9417DFC71640FC523BC
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1548
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1629
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1548
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1629
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 OCCU labourer
1 FAMS @F4169@
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I7702@ INDI
1 NAME Isabel /Cory/
2 GIVN Isabel
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 9F814929DC0B1344B5CA157AB4A88042FC95
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1542
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1542
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I7703@ INDI
1 NAME Agnes /Cory/
2 GIVN Agnes
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 29F976C36DEFD84AB4902F9D6A1D26B248A5
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1549
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1549
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I8271@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 71F1906E73899C4995F2C785F7779494AA1B
1 CHAN
2 DATE 23 Oct 2004
1 NOTE Thier son, Thomas, may on may not be Thomas of Chelmsford, MA.  This co
2 CONC nnection has not been verified, so should be taken as a possibility unt
2 CONC il proven one way or another.
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1603
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1664
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE ABT 1603
2 _SDATE 2 JUL 1603
1 BURI
2 DATE 1664
1 OCCU yeoman
1 FAMS @F2960@
1 FAMS @F4177@
1 FAMS @F4178@
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I8272@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 731E9CDAB044774386BD11BFDE4A00CBBB56
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 SOUR @S105@
1 SOUR @S104@
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1577
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1645
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1577
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1645
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F2966@
1 FAMC @F2961@
0 @I8273@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 1364C100EA58434E9859D0071BF9E2450E48
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 SOUR @S105@
1 SOUR @S104@
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1549
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1591
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1549
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1591
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F2961@
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I8288@ INDI
1 NAME Richard /Cory/
2 GIVN Richard
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 74DD5EA02357D3498846BA7DDD9545CD6E28
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1626
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1671
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1626
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1671
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 OCCU yeoman
1 FAMC @F2960@
0 @I8289@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Harris/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Harris
1 SEX F
1 _UID 7BD389D0A722564190B42A5AC9A6A6664AFC
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 BURI
2 DATE 1626
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F2960@
0 @I8290@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID E14C5DC00CAB744E9B27E9CF5E7022295628
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1624
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1652
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1624
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1652
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMC @F2960@
0 @I8291@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Ashbee/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Ashbee
1 SEX F
1 _UID 56A20A15F5378544A839EC032F899881AD58
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1612
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1612
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F2966@
0 @I8292@ INDI
1 NAME William /Cory/
2 GIVN William
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 3C5AAFE8EB39084CA27CDDA07891B0090291
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1545
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1545
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11602@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Ward/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Ward
1 SEX F
1 _UID EB9FEEF48433864881624EB198E1F25593C9
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F2961@
0 @I11603@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 68131739F861164983E1C2E32603E1EC8285
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT
2 DATE 1551
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1551
1 BURI
2 DATE 1551
1 FAMS @F4156@
1 FAMS @F4157@
0 @I11604@ INDI
1 NAME unknown //
2 GIVN unknown
1 SEX F
1 _UID B4B840C11B97BC458B1B355D350AE8981759
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4156@
0 @I11605@ INDI
1 NAME Emma /Dunkley/
2 GIVN Emma
2 SURN Dunkley
1 SEX F
1 _UID 213D776D1D82464EA967A08D9FF2C4C0C74E
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4157@
0 @I11606@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 13ACCBC81AB5784EBF17E41AEC485567ABFF
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 SOUR @S287@
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1567
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1567
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
2 SOUR @S286@
1 OCCU Husbandman
1 FAMS @F2751@
1 FAMC @F4156@
0 @I11607@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 8D256AC75A01A840B5FCC5CCB015A7E6BA4E
1 CHAN
2 DATE 11 Sep 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4160@
1 FAMC @F4156@
0 @I11608@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID D7B2B16B4CEF314E973DEDA0F9B994343AF4
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE of Upton.
2 CONT
2 CONT
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1567
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1567
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F4158@
1 FAMC @F4156@
0 @I11609@ INDI
1 NAME William /Cory/
2 GIVN William
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 1E1183592EA7D44798F65CA544913A6A0326
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE Of Brington.
2 CONT
2 CONT
1 DEAT
2 DATE BEF 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F4161@
1 FAMC @F4156@
0 @I11610@ INDI
1 NAME Henry /Cory/
2 GIVN Henry
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 3BBD272D1648404094645AACEA42C8F10DD1
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BURI
2 DATE 1554
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4162@
1 FAMC @F4156@
0 @I11612@ INDI
1 NAME Eliz /Lyne/
2 GIVN Eliz
2 SURN Lyne
1 SEX F
1 _UID 2558841EB942824AB2DE5070FF348DB3A97D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4160@
0 @I11613@ INDI
1 NAME unknown //
2 GIVN unknown
1 SEX F
1 _UID 8A64E1E60112B44798A7699403D97E5AB369
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMS @F4161@
0 @I11614@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Burnell/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Burnell
1 SEX F
1 _UID ECFAFED4C614E34197DD6E36D84DC4DE956B
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4162@
0 @I11615@ INDI
1 NAME Henry /Cory/
2 GIVN Henry
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 3E62A5C1429E504ABC3D328372FD03610179
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4162@
0 @I11616@ INDI
1 NAME Luke /Cory/
2 GIVN Luke
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 2561F16F143457458A194301ED688746D3A5
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1552
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1552
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4162@
0 @I11617@ INDI
1 NAME Anne /Cory/
2 GIVN Anne
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID CA1B8A9D7EC5714BAC7A2D36B8672A401DA1
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1554
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1554
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4162@
0 @I11618@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID B96573E29F8121428C6E35FDC637BA5932F5
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4161@
0 @I11619@ INDI
1 NAME Henry /Cory/
2 GIVN Henry
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 2D84D08271AE6544A3DCB6B1EE446B489619
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4161@
0 @I11620@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID B0CE4FBFAF5C4446BA8FE19D1F7700B93707
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4161@
0 @I11621@ INDI
1 NAME Richard /Cory/
2 GIVN Richard
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 05B3E23FCB31544FA53D0E9FB1F169798B2E
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4161@
0 @I11622@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 90FA53AAC413DD489F23CC7E5AC0AAE93C0D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4161@
0 @I11623@ INDI
1 NAME Agnes /Cory/
2 GIVN Agnes
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 34251835E75C1A4BAC4B6E14A93931340E25
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4161@
0 @I11624@ INDI
1 NAME Alice //
2 GIVN Alice
1 SEX F
1 _UID 7004E178D49FD042BAEA25293BC586B47EB5
1 CHAN
2 DATE 11 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 PLAC Upton?
1 DEAT
2 DATE 1557
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F4158@
0 @I11625@ INDI
1 NAME Robert /Cory/
2 GIVN Robert
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 2230D3D87FDA754CA6D1170C9799AD45D375
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE of Litchborough.
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1538
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1592
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1538
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1592
2 _SDATE 2 JUL 1592
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
2 SOUR @S286@
1 FAMS @F4163@
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11626@ INDI
1 NAME An /Cory/
2 GIVN An
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID BBC151EE515AC240BB67B27C498A53C19F6B
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1541
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1541
2 _SDATE 3 JUL 1541
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1541
2 _SDATE 2 JUL 1541
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1541
2 _SDATE 4 JUL 1541
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11627@ INDI
1 NAME Henrye /Cory/
2 GIVN Henrye
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 7969D977A392B54A88CCF9AA14F0C1C1E395
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1543
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE 1544
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1543
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11628@ INDI
1 NAME Ann /Cory/
2 GIVN Ann
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID A49CAE79D1464D48BDDDABC9B68590C0AC8E
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1546
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1546
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11629@ INDI
1 NAME Mary /Cory/
2 GIVN Mary
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 6319E2D2FCA53E4AAAC622DAC72F337361E4
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1551
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4164@
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11630@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 3175CC6FF8C08E498F56EC1791803868091C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1554
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1554
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11631@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Cory/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 585EBB3821FB7040886E8882DCBDA69F5397
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1556
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1556
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4165@
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11632@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID EEE029F458BDEA40B1FD65C5BED7F452DDA6
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE Husbandman of Flore, nsi.
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1552
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1592
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1592
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F4166@
1 FAMC @F4158@
0 @I11633@ INDI
1 NAME Susan /Britten/
2 GIVN Susan
2 SURN Britten
1 SEX F
1 _UID D5DE725416377045AFBA84F4789640B55F45
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4163@
0 @I11634@ INDI
1 NAME  /Heycock/
2 SURN Heycock
1 SEX M
1 _UID 0B387E89AB361247ADDA9D0CEADBD4F23F75
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMS @F4164@
0 @I11635@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Harris/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Harris
1 SEX M
1 _UID 05F3F928768AF44AAB6AA6CFF333656FDB96
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4165@
0 @I11636@ INDI
1 NAME Mary //
2 GIVN Mary
1 SEX F
1 _UID 8ABDF141C1548042A01F1B63F18B4F85DD1A
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMS @F4166@
0 @I11638@ INDI
1 NAME Lucy //
2 GIVN Lucy
1 SEX F
1 _UID 0AECBE688B2AB44A8307C65E420EDCC9728A
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1618
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1618
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F4169@
0 @I11639@ INDI
1 NAME Sarah //
2 GIVN Sarah
1 SEX F
1 _UID 7C60BEAB47BF1A4585B1DF6A16496C433706
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMS @F4170@
0 @I11640@ INDI
1 NAME unknown /Cory/
2 GIVN unknown
2 SURN Cory
1 _UID A75185AA1D045440A9B6506E81007A887CEF
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4170@
0 @I11641@ INDI
1 NAME Parnell /Cory/
2 GIVN Parnell
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 5D65CCE624DCCE4181C1E7BE292152B8BEDC
1 CHAN
2 DATE 21 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4170@
0 @I11642@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Cory/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 51E8011C3878C94AB8E9EB78682FFD0EBF8C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1589
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1589
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4169@
0 @I11643@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 4841174816E79B4CB39CB85373C88350342D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1594
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1594
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4169@
0 @I11644@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 8072C443B636B341A930E5AAB3954F845CE3
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1596
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1596
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4169@
0 @I11645@ INDI
1 NAME Joan /Cory/
2 GIVN Joan
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 6B0C934535ED594294C19242DDD661E32C9E
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1602
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1602
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4169@
0 @I11646@ INDI
1 NAME William /Cory/
2 GIVN William
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID BD1BE9C41483FA45B5B23002C6A7AC546142
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1605
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1605
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4169@
0 @I11647@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 334B9868FBC1834485E850B988C2FEA160BE
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1607
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1612
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1588
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1590
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1593
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1607
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1612
2 _SDATE 2 JUL 1612
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1590
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1593
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMC @F4169@
0 @I11649@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Dunkley/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Dunkley
1 SEX F
1 _UID 2991F6382CED6C4096D6C3857FAB13670551
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F2751@
0 @I11650@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 7469C7BD4085E1418D65C7173E2F32934A70
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1541
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4160@
0 @I11651@ INDI
1 NAME Anne /Cory/
2 GIVN Anne
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 3E7C91B63DA63B4384E83DC239458B0EE47E
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1565
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1565
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4163@
0 @I11652@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID C8B5E415EA39FA4BB2365C494DDA82CBDFA6
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1566
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1566
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4163@
0 @I11653@ INDI
1 NAME Amy /Cory/
2 GIVN Amy
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID D097C9F02E449B4895171F312C65064B53DF
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1568
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1568
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4163@
0 @I11654@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID CFA73F874E5FE2488477D7CBB4A45D68CD5F
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1570
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1600
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1570
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1600
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 OCCU tailor
2 SOUR @S286@
1 FAMC @F4163@
0 @I11655@ INDI
1 NAME Henry /Cory/
2 GIVN Henry
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 714A01FD87D6F247A8490AF841A419276762
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1571
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1571
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4163@
0 @I11656@ INDI
1 NAME Christoper /Cory/
2 GIVN Christoper
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID C222DC8B1E68594284564B668CB2BA03F2D8
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 FAMC @F4163@
0 @I11657@ INDI
1 NAME Ursula /Cory/
2 GIVN Ursula
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID F6BD0B899674C8409AB435E96F7E30FADC2D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 FAMC @F4163@
0 @I11658@ INDI
1 NAME Joan /Cory/
2 GIVN Joan
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID F91176426EC53A4B8C0FDDCD6F8E5BE4FBDB
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1602
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1602
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I11659@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Cory/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 7A7EEAE269D3B749B493D974D0EAAC09035A
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1602
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1602
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I11660@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 4E2FF85C427A5A42A60CB9999B26032C1DF0
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1604
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1604
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I11661@ INDI
1 NAME Robert /Cory/
2 GIVN Robert
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID B0FB4B1DF225D243BC1DB6E9EF5780BE3BC1
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1606
1 CHR
2 DATE 1606
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I11662@ INDI
1 NAME Richard /Cory/
2 GIVN Richard
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 084BB6330E94D64F8E73A36DA67E7213BD28
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1607
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1607
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I11663@ INDI
1 NAME Amy /Cory/
2 GIVN Amy
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 0B1ACE08E6492140BF744B46FACD4724819C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1609
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1609
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I11664@ INDI
1 NAME Alyce /Cory/
2 GIVN Alyce
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID DFE958546FBD0340830F78B5AADE2070BA28
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1611
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1611
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2966@
0 @I11665@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 649148BC469D6848B0C5CA32BC81A6C6A6F8
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1580
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1580
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2961@
0 @I11666@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID A5C1C895223F7E4598E33F954B57441A36F1
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1583
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1648
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1583
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1648
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
2 SOUR @S286@
3 DATA
4 TEXT PCC will
1 OCCU yeoman
1 FAMS @F4171@
1 FAMC @F2961@
0 @I11667@ INDI
1 NAME Robert /Cory/
2 GIVN Robert
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 4919C88553751D4BB7DD4F9801C5404DAD1D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1585
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1585
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2961@
0 @I11668@ INDI
1 NAME Joan /Harris/
2 GIVN Joan
2 SURN Harris
1 SEX F
1 _UID 062828B0C5FCD64F970E8C86FB4B61CD1767
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1679
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1679
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
2 SOUR @S286@
1 FAMS @F4171@
0 @I11669@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID CE17702EE3EDC8469F1D0D33CA62375414E8
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1622
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1688
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1622
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1688
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 OCCU yeoman
2 _SDATE 1 JUL 1650
2 SOUR @S286@
1 FAMS @F4172@
1 FAMC @F4171@
0 @I11670@ INDI
1 NAME Richard /Cory/
2 GIVN Richard
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 69E05606C18BD9469730BE18E3AC88773BB2
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1624
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1636
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1624
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1636
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMC @F4171@
0 @I11671@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID BBFE652C7164564385A11BA4B99191CB438C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1624
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1662
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1624
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1662
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 OCCU yeoman
2 _SDATE 1 JUL 1650
1 FAMS @F4173@
1 FAMC @F4171@
0 @I11672@ INDI
1 NAME Sarah /Cory/
2 GIVN Sarah
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 2CB60686B81E9B40977966CD2F374C0A1E33
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1631
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1631
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4212@
1 FAMC @F4171@
0 @I11673@ INDI
1 NAME Samuel /Cory/
2 GIVN Samuel
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID B09AC255675E584C9E466A081CEA92DB9398
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1634
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1634
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4171@
0 @I11674@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth //
2 GIVN Elizabeth
1 SEX F
1 _UID B736A7917222D447AB13DDEF9409DD7D5506
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 FAMS @F4172@
0 @I11675@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID DE6B02E7E3431440BFE9BDEA69A20AC8D846
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1657
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1657
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4172@
0 @I11676@ INDI
1 NAME Nathanial /Cory/
2 GIVN Nathanial
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 75BC1176841E5B4BB1E390477F6187E2B47A
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE of Welton.
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1659
2 PLAC Welton, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1659
2 PLAC Welton, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4172@
0 @I11677@ INDI
1 NAME Joseph /Cory/
2 GIVN Joseph
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 5361BC3D2B6C5B42A4716021D54244380ABE
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1663
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1663
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4172@
0 @I11678@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth //
2 GIVN Elizabeth
1 SEX F
1 _UID D7B9C63012CE3D4A81DD0F60BEA89BF1AC9D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 FAMS @F4173@
0 @I11679@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 3F4772C29871AC4FB9CFF55A7AB9B6E563FE
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1654
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1731
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1654
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE ABT 1731
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 OCCU grocer
1 FAMC @F4173@
0 @I11680@ INDI
1 NAME Sarah /Cory/
2 GIVN Sarah
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 90D55774816F2C45B0B51291A178055E151F
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1659
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1659
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4173@
0 @I11681@ INDI
1 NAME Mary /Cory/
2 GIVN Mary
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 456FA66294ECBA4B8EDF9BB348E8657E0FA4
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1663
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1663
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4173@
0 @I11696@ INDI
1 NAME Ursula //
2 GIVN Ursula
1 SEX F
1 _UID A81E8DB2E4D3E746AB506FE3E6539D6C7807
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1637
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1637
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F4177@
0 @I11697@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth //
2 GIVN Elizabeth
1 SEX F
1 _UID E0F20B24A07DCF4CBE5B9E8B2FBB5F6F332F
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1674
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1674
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMS @F4178@
0 @I11698@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID C9787147AB12F14DB67D0A0F47F8CDB3FF3D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1628
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1628
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4177@
0 @I11699@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Cory/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID C34F0005F5835243B4F5B94644C276509857
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1630
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1630
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4177@
0 @I11700@ INDI
1 NAME Robert /Cory/
2 GIVN Robert
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 9BAFA8B7E25026488B5885645610A2213E37
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1632
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1632
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4177@
0 @I11701@ INDI
1 NAME Benjamin /Cory/
2 GIVN Benjamin
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 036312060F632547BB8739E693FB4D7A12DB
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1635
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1692
1 CHR
2 DATE 1635
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1692
2 PLAC Weston Favell, Northhampton, England
2 SOUR @S286@
1 FAMC @F4177@
0 @I11702@ INDI
1 NAME Samuel /Cory/
2 GIVN Samuel
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID F718B36F7A20C9419054E59549D6C0BCCE75
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1637
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT
2 DATE ABT 1680
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 16 JUL 1637
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 BURI
2 DATE 1680
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 FAMC @F4177@
0 @I11715@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID C39881AFBF3CA04093000F41C2742304A6F6
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1640
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1640
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4178@
0 @I11716@ INDI
1 NAME William /Cory/
2 GIVN William
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 3F7069BA505191488AC51636733C86C4E0B2
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1642
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1642
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4178@
0 @I11717@ INDI
1 NAME Sarah /Cory/
2 GIVN Sarah
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 61D666CB14D1C344BD7459C9370C76DF3F4C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1651
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1651
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4178@
0 @I11718@ INDI
1 NAME Dorothy /Cory/
2 GIVN Dorothy
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID ADAFC56412B98146B9C15B98B1E79726D92C
1 CHAN
2 DATE 22 Jun 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1653
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1653
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4178@
0 @I11719@ INDI
1 NAME Nathaniel /Cory/
2 GIVN Nathaniel
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 4B8249B4C4A0314AB479F013493FBA415C88
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 NOTE of Spratton.
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1644
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1644
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4178@
0 @I11801@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID D26EDB17D311D94B9E3264E4E7DCF43740DC
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 FAMS @F4210@
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I11802@ INDI
1 NAME Alice //
2 GIVN Alice
1 SEX F
1 _UID 5F853F3F1F6FFE4E85D5D2024FF32EECC691
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 DEAT
2 DATE 1557
1 FAMS @F4210@
0 @I11803@ INDI
1 NAME Ann /Cory/
2 GIVN Ann
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 648D938B9EBEC54B944B7FFBC8945EAC3A55
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1541
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4210@
0 @I11804@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 6E7DE673C8E80841BD0C245B0202CDF54B07
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1549
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMS @F4211@
1 FAMC @F4210@
0 @I11805@ INDI
1 NAME Henry /Cory/
2 GIVN Henry
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 057F2087B928D3439C9A1752197B1F2CA0D2
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1543
1 DEAT
2 DATE 1544
1 FAMC @F4210@
0 @I11806@ INDI
1 NAME William /Cory/
2 GIVN William
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 289126BE94714D4FAF63D0B39A87027C7256
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1545
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4210@
0 @I11807@ INDI
1 NAME Robert /Cory/
2 GIVN Robert
2 SURN Cory
1 _UID AC311DF7E4DD4C4C9EAA38A42DB3368C1072
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1538
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4210@
0 @I11808@ INDI
1 NAME Elizabeth /Ward/
2 GIVN Elizabeth
2 SURN Ward
1 SEX F
1 _UID D4BF406C68AAD54BA627CA35547E962CD1B8
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 FAMS @F4211@
0 @I11809@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID 932765BC72CFDA498A4109D754D97953E37D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1580
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4211@
0 @I11810@ INDI
1 NAME Robert /Cory/
2 GIVN Robert
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID B2C7471CA25CA34BB40D70ADA66F8BC40A5F
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1585
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4211@
0 @I11811@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID C2EF3767AC737241902459A927AA4CA498D1
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1577
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4211@
0 @I11812@ INDI
1 NAME Thomas /Cory/
2 GIVN Thomas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 01658E482854EA45A4657D7BE0920433911D
1 CHAN
2 DATE 4 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE 1583
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F4211@
0 @I11813@ INDI
1 NAME  /Gilbert/
2 SURN Gilbert
1 SEX M
1 _UID 68B5E66A2082014FBDC21844E7B1FE3F0FFC
1 CHAN
2 DATE 11 Sep 2004
1 FAMS @F4212@
0 @I11839@ INDI
1 NAME Nicholas /Cory/
2 GIVN Nicholas
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID 3F4256CE77F1BC49A239C9E1D93750958CC8
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 FAMC @F4169@
0 @I11840@ INDI
1 NAME Alice /Cory/
2 GIVN Alice
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX F
1 _UID DF980B60DDCA0B41B336C156D811FC11CBF5
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1539
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1539
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2751@
0 @I11841@ INDI
1 NAME John /Cory/
2 GIVN John
2 SURN Cory
1 SEX M
1 _UID F44A7FA52D409749AED4EBAF491EB02F1172
1 CHAN
2 DATE 29 Sep 2004
1 BIRT
2 DATE ABT 1588
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 CHR
2 DATE 1588
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
1 DEAT Y
1 FAMC @F2961@
0 @F32@ FAM
1 HUSB @I70@
1 WIFE @I71@
1 CHIL @I77@
1 CHIL @I75@
1 CHIL @I76@
1 CHIL @I78@
1 CHIL @I79@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1 JUL 1642
0 @F33@ FAM
1 HUSB @I70@
1 WIFE @I72@
1 MARR
2 DATE 11 APR 1664
2 PLAC Salem, Essex Co, MA
2 NOTE
3 CONT The marriage of Mary and Giles is recorded in the Salem V.R. where Mary
3 CONC 's name is spelled "Brite".  This is the first and only instance of thi
3 CONC s spelling that I have been able to find.   It would appear that this i
3 CONC s either an old spelling that was changed to Bright in later years or j
3 CONC ust another misspelling. There are many entries in the Salem and surrou
3 CONC nding Townships of the name Bright.  As with many other names, the name "
3 CONC Brite" and "Britz" has been incorrectly, recorded in several genealogie
3 CONC s.
3 CONT
3 CONT
0 @F34@ FAM
1 HUSB @I70@
1 WIFE @I73@
1 MARR
2 DATE 27 APR 1690
0 @F1546@ FAM
1 HUSB @I4301@
1 WIFE @I4302@
1 CHIL @I70@
1 CHIL @I7692@
1 CHIL @I7693@
1 MARR
2 DATE ABT 1620
0 @F2750@ FAM
1 HUSB @I7694@
1 WIFE @I7695@
1 CHIL @I4301@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1583
2 PLAC Kislingbury Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F2751@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11606@
1 WIFE @I11649@
1 CHIL @I11840@
1 CHIL @I7698@
1 CHIL @I7702@
1 CHIL @I7694@
1 CHIL @I7701@
1 CHIL @I7703@
1 CHIL @I7699@
1 CHIL @I7700@
1 CHIL @I11801@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1539
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F2960@ FAM
1 HUSB @I8271@
1 WIFE @I8289@
1 CHIL @I68@
1 CHIL @I8290@
1 CHIL @I8288@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1622
0 @F2961@ FAM
1 HUSB @I8273@
1 WIFE @I11602@
1 CHIL @I8272@
1 CHIL @I11665@
1 CHIL @I11666@
1 CHIL @I11667@
1 CHIL @I11841@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1575
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F2966@ FAM
1 HUSB @I8272@
1 WIFE @I8291@
1 CHIL @I11658@
1 CHIL @I11659@
1 CHIL @I8271@
1 CHIL @I11660@
1 CHIL @I11661@
1 CHIL @I11662@
1 CHIL @I11663@
1 CHIL @I11664@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1601
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4156@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11603@
1 WIFE @I11604@
1 CHIL @I11606@
1 CHIL @I11607@
1 CHIL @I11608@
1 CHIL @I11609@
1 CHIL @I11610@
1 MARR
2 DATE BEF 1538
0 @F4157@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11603@
1 WIFE @I11605@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1538
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4158@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11608@
1 WIFE @I11624@
1 CHIL @I11625@
1 CHIL @I11626@
1 CHIL @I11627@
1 CHIL @I8292@
1 CHIL @I11628@
1 CHIL @I8273@
1 CHIL @I11629@
1 CHIL @I11632@
1 CHIL @I11630@
1 CHIL @I11631@
1 MARR
2 _SDATE 1 JUL 1545
2 NOTE of Upton.
0 @F4160@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11607@
1 WIFE @I11612@
1 CHIL @I11650@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1540
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4161@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11609@
1 WIFE @I11613@
1 CHIL @I11618@
1 CHIL @I11619@
1 CHIL @I11620@
1 CHIL @I11621@
1 CHIL @I11622@
1 CHIL @I11623@
0 @F4162@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11610@
1 WIFE @I11614@
1 CHIL @I11615@
1 CHIL @I11616@
1 CHIL @I11617@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1550
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4163@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11625@
1 WIFE @I11633@
1 CHIL @I11651@
1 CHIL @I11652@
1 CHIL @I11653@
1 CHIL @I11654@
1 CHIL @I11655@
1 CHIL @I11656@
1 CHIL @I11657@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1564
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4164@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11634@
1 WIFE @I11629@
0 @F4165@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11635@
1 WIFE @I11631@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1581
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4166@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11632@
1 WIFE @I11636@
0 @F4169@ FAM
1 HUSB @I7701@
1 WIFE @I11638@
1 CHIL @I11642@
1 CHIL @I11643@
1 CHIL @I11644@
1 CHIL @I11839@
1 CHIL @I11645@
1 CHIL @I11646@
1 CHIL @I11647@
1 MARR
2 DATE ABT 1588
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4170@ FAM
1 HUSB @I7700@
1 WIFE @I11639@
1 CHIL @I11640@
1 CHIL @I11641@
0 @F4171@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11666@
1 WIFE @I11668@
1 CHIL @I11669@
1 CHIL @I11670@
1 CHIL @I11671@
1 CHIL @I11672@
1 CHIL @I11673@
1 MARR
2 DATE 1621/22
2 PLAC Harpole Parish, Northampton, England
0 @F4172@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11669@
1 WIFE @I11674@
1 CHIL @I11675@
1 CHIL @I11676@
1 CHIL @I11677@
0 @F4173@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11671@
1 WIFE @I11678@
1 CHIL @I11679@
1 CHIL @I11680@
1 CHIL @I11681@
0 @F4177@ FAM
1 HUSB @I8271@
1 WIFE @I11696@
1 CHIL @I11698@
1 CHIL @I11699@
1 CHIL @I11700@
1 CHIL @I11701@
1 CHIL @I11702@
1 MARR
2 DATE ABT 1627
0 @F4178@ FAM
1 HUSB @I8271@
1 WIFE @I11697@
1 CHIL @I11715@
1 CHIL @I11716@
1 CHIL @I11719@
1 CHIL @I11717@
1 CHIL @I11718@
1 MARR
2 DATE ABT 1639
0 @F4210@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11801@
1 WIFE @I11802@
1 CHIL @I11807@
1 CHIL @I11803@
1 CHIL @I11805@
1 CHIL @I11806@
1 CHIL @I11804@
0 @F4211@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11804@
1 WIFE @I11808@
1 CHIL @I11811@
1 CHIL @I11809@
1 CHIL @I11812@
1 CHIL @I11810@
0 @F4212@ FAM
1 HUSB @I11813@
1 WIFE @I11672@
0 @S29@ SOUR
1 ABBR Genealogical and Family History of NH
1 TITL Genealogical and Family History of the State of New Hampshire
1 _SUBQ Genealogical and Family History of the State of New Hampshire
1 _BIBL Genealogical and Family History of the State of New Hampshire.
0 @S96@ SOUR
1 ABBR Mayflower Families
1 TITL Mayflower Families
1 _SUBQ Mayflower Families
1 _BIBL Mayflower Families.
0 @S97@ SOUR
1 ABBR History of Salem, Vol III
1 TITL History of Salem, Vol III
1 _SUBQ History of Salem, Vol III
1 _BIBL History of Salem, Vol III.
0 @S98@ SOUR
1 ABBR Enrollments of Indentures of Apprenticements
1 TITL Enrollments of Indentures of Apprenticements and Admissions to Freedom.
2 CONC
2 CONT
2 CONT
2 CONT Northampton, England
1 _SUBQ Enrollments of Indentures of Apprenticements and Admissions to Freedom.
2 CONC
2 CONT
2 CONT
2 CONT Northampton, England
1 _BIBL Enrollments of Indentures of Apprenticements and Admissions to Freedom.
2 CONC
2 CONT
2 CONT
2 CONT Northampton, England.
0 @S104@ SOUR
1 ABBR Imported GEDCOM file from FTM CD
1 TITL GEDCOM file imported on 7 Sep 1999.
1 _SUBQ GEDCOM file imported on 7 Sep 1999.
1 _BIBL GEDCOM file imported on 7 Sep 1999.
0 @S105@ SOUR
1 ABBR Imported GEDCOM file
1 TITL GEDCOM file imported on 1 Jun 1999.
1 _SUBQ GEDCOM file imported on 1 Jun 1999.
1 _BIBL GEDCOM file imported on 1 Jun 1999.
0 @S286@ SOUR
1 ABBR Will
1 TITL Will
0 @S287@ SOUR
1 ABBR Allen, Derek J [Derek.Allen@bristol.ac.uk]
1 TITL Allen, Derek J [Derek.Allen@bristol.ac.uk] Cory of Harpole family tree
0 _EVDEF BIRT
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Birth
1 ABBR Birth
1 SENT <name> was born <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF DEAT
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Death
1 ABBR Death
1 SENT <name> died <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF CHR
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Christen
1 ABBR Chr
1 SENT <name> was christened <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF BURI
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Burial
1 ABBR Burial
1 SENT <name> was buried <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF CREM
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Cremation
1 ABBR Cremation
1 SENT <name> was cremated <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF ADOP
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Adoption
1 ABBR Adoption
1 SENT <name> was adopted <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF BAPM
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Baptism
1 ABBR Baptism
1 SENT <name> was baptized <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF BARM
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Bar Mitzvah
1 ABBR Bar Mitzvah
1 SENT <name> celebrated his bar mitzvah <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF BASM
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Bas Mitzvah
1 ABBR Bas Mitzvah
1 SENT <name> celebrated her bas mitzvah <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF BLES
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Blessing
1 ABBR Blessing
1 SENT <name> was blessed <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF CHRA
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Christen (adult)
1 ABBR Chr (adult)
1 SENT <name> was christened <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF CONF
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Confirmation
1 ABBR Confirmation
1 SENT <name> was confirmed <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF FCOM
1 TYPE P
1 TITL First communion
1 ABBR First comm
1 SENT <name> received first communion <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF ORDN
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Ordination
1 ABBR Ordination
1 SENT <name> was ordained <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF NATU
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Naturalization
1 ABBR Naturalization
1 SENT <name> was naturalized <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF EMIG
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Emigration
1 ABBR Emigration
1 SENT <name> emigrated <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 2
0 _EVDEF IMMI
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Immigration
1 ABBR Immigration
1 SENT <name> immigrated <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 1
0 _EVDEF CENS
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Census
1 ABBR Census
1 SENT <name> appeared in the census <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF PROB
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Probate
1 ABBR Probate
1 SENT <name> had <hisher> estate probated <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF WILL
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Will
1 ABBR Will
1 SENT <name> signed a will <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF GRAD
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Graduated
1 ABBR Graduation
1 SENT <name> graduated <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF RETI
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Retirement
1 ABBR Retirement
1 SENT <name> retired <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF DSCR
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Description
1 ABBR Description
1 SENT <name> was described as <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF EDUC
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Education
1 ABBR Education
1 SENT <name> was educated <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF NATI
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Nationality
1 ABBR Nationality
1 SENT <name> was <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF OCCU
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Occupation
1 ABBR Occupation
1 SENT <date> <name> was <avalue> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF PROP
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Property
1 ABBR Property
1 SENT <name> owned <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF RELI
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Religion
1 ABBR Religion
1 SENT <name> was <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF RESI
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Residence
1 ABBR Residence
1 SENT <name> lived <value> <place> <date>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF SSN
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Soc Sec No
1 ABBR SSN
1 SENT <name> had Social Security Number <value>.
1 PLAC N
1 DATE N
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF BAPL
1 TYPE P
1 TITL LDS Baptism
1 ABBR LDS Bapt
1 SENT <name> was baptized into the LDS Church <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF ENDL
1 TYPE P
1 TITL LDS Endowment
1 ABBR LDS Endow
1 SENT <name> was endowed <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF SLGC
1 TYPE P
1 TITL LDS Seal to parents
1 ABBR LDS SealPar
1 SENT <name> was sealed to <hisher> parents <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF AFN
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Ancestral File Number
1 ABBR AFN
1 SENT <name> has Ancestral File Number <value>.
1 PLAC N
1 DATE N
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF REFN
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Reference No
1 ABBR Ref #
1 SENT <name> is reference number <value>.
1 PLAC N
1 DATE N
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF CAST
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Caste
1 ABBR Caste
1 SENT <name> was associated with <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF MARR
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Marriage
1 ABBR Marriage
1 SENT <couple> were married <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF ANUL
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Annulment
1 ABBR Annulment
1 SENT <couple> had their marriage annulled <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF DIV
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Divorce
1 ABBR Divorce
1 SENT <couple> were divorced <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF DIVF
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Divorce filed
1 ABBR Div. filed
1 SENT <couple> filed for divorce <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF ENGA
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Engagement
1 ABBR Engagement
1 SENT <couple> were engaged <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF MARB
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Marriage Bann
1 ABBR Marr Bann
1 SENT <couple> had marriage banns published <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF MARC
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Marriage Contract
1 ABBR Marr Contract
1 SENT <couple> signed a marriage contract <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF MARL
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Marriage License
1 ABBR Marr Lic
1 SENT <couple> obtained a marriage license <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF MARS
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Marriage Settlement
1 ABBR Marr Settlement
1 SENT <couple> obtained a marriage settlement <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF SLGS
1 TYPE F
1 TITL LDS Seal to spouse
1 ABBR LDS SealSp
1 SENT <couple> were sealed together <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF RESI
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Residence (family)
1 ABBR Residence (fam)
1 SENT <couple> lived <value> <place> <date>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF CENS
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Census (family)
1 ABBR Census (fam)
1 SENT <couple> appeared in the census <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Degree
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Degree
1 ABBR Degree
1 SENT <name> received a degree <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Military
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Military
1 ABBR Military
1 SENT <name> served in the military <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Mission
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Mission
1 ABBR Mission
1 SENT <name> served a mission <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Stillborn
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Stillborn
1 ABBR Stillborn
1 SENT <name> was stillborn <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Illness
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Illness
1 ABBR Illness
1 SENT <name> was ill with <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Living
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Living
1 ABBR Living
1 SENT <name> was living <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Elected
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Election
1 ABBR Elected
1 SENT <name> was elected as <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Excomm
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Excommunication
1 ABBR Excomm
1 SENT <name> was excommunicated <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Namesake
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Namesake
1 ABBR Namesake
1 SENT <name> was named after <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Separation
1 TYPE F
1 TITL Separation
1 ABBR Separation
1 SENT <couple> were separated <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Alt. Name
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Alternate name
1 ABBR Alt. Name
1 SENT <name> was also known as <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC N
1 DATE Y
1 DESC N
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Misc
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Miscellaneous
1 ABBR Misc
1 SENT <name> <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Funeral
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Funeral
1 ABBR Funeral
1 SENT The funeral for <name> was held <date> <place>, <value>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Discharged
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Discharged
1 ABBR Discharged
1 SENT <name> was dischared from <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Enlisted
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Enlisted
1 ABBR Enlisted
1 SENT <name> enlisted in the <value> <date> <place>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Ship
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Ship
1 ABBR Ship
1 SENT <name> is found in the ship roles of <value> <date>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF DAR
1 TYPE P
1 TITL DAR
1 ABBR DAR
1 SENT <name> is listed as DAR number <value>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Birth Time
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Birth Time
1 ABBR Birth Time
1 SENT <name> was born at <value>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Birth Size
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Birth Size
1 ABBR Birth Size
1 SENT <name> was <value> at birth.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 _EVDEF Birth Hospital
1 TYPE P
1 TITL Birth Hospital
1 ABBR Birth Hospital
1 SENT <name> was born in <value> <date>.
1 PLAC Y
1 DATE Y
1 DESC Y
1 PPFX 0
0 TRLR